Re: [infinispan-dev] The need for a 5.1.1

I really didn't want to do this, but it looks like a 5.1.1 will be necessary. The biggest (critical, IMO, for 5.1.1) issues I see are: 1. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1786 - I presume this has to do with a bug Mircea spotted that virtual nodes were not being enabled by the config parser. Which meant that even in the case of tests enabling virtual nodes, we still saw uneven distribution and hence poor performance (well spotted, Mircea). 2. Related to 1, I don't think there is a JIRA for this yet, to change the default number of virtual nodes from 1 to 100 or so. After we profile and analyse the impact of enabling this by default. I'm particularly concerned about (a) memory footprint and (b) effects on Hot Rod relaying topology information back to clients. Maybe 10 is a more sane default as a result. 3. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1788 - config parser out of sync with XSD! 4. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1798 - forceReturnValues parameter in the RemoteCacheManager.getCache() method is ignored! In addition, we may as well have these "nice to have's" in as well: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1787 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1793 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1795 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1789 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1784 What do you think? Anything else you feel that is crucial for a 5.1.1? I'd like to do this sooner rather than later, so we can still focus on 5.2.0. So please respond asap. Paul, I'd also like your thoughts on this from an AS7 perspective. Cheers Manik -- Manik Surtani manik(a)jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev