On 2/8/13 3:23 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
Hi Bela,
Do you think we can have this particular improvement in JGroups by 18
Feb? That week Pedro, Dan and I are going to start integrating TO
protocols in ISPN and this is a requirement for it.
It is done and part of the alpha1 release...
On 8 Feb 2013, at 12:41, Pedro Ruivo wrote:
> On 2/8/13 12:26 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
>>
>> On 7 Feb 2013, at 11:36, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 Feb 2013, at 11:29, Bela Ban <bban(a)redhat.com
>>> <mailto:bban@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I meant to say that this is up to you guys to decide inwhich
>>>> Infinispan
>>>> release this will be used, but it will be available in JGroups 3.3.
>>>>
>>>> What's the strategy/schedule for 6 and 5.3 anyway ?
>>>
>>> 5.3 will be relatively quick, just an incremental release mainly
>>> targeting reviewing and putting in a few contribs on the queue.
>>> E.g., we're hoping for 5.3 to be feature-complete in no more than 2
>>> months.
>>>
>>> 6 is where we get to break API - specifically with the new
>>> packaging, etc.
>>>
>>> But this seems like a pretty important feature/fix so it may make
>>> sense to get this into 5.3.
>>
>> Pedro - please correct me if I'm wrong.
>> This feature (or the alternative Pedro has already implemented in
>> his branch) is used be the TO code that we'll integrate in 5.3. Se
>> in order to have TO in ISPN we need these jgroups improvements in.
> yes, I'll need it. otherwise, I have to create another RpcCommand to
> send back the response generated by the other thread
>>
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org <
http://www.infinispan.org>)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (
http://www.jgroups.org)