On 06 Jun 2014, at 15:04, William Burns <mudokonman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Does that answer your question? Because I’m not sure what you
mean by the key being attached to the Tx.
The difference is say you have a tx1 on thread 1 then on the same
thread you ask for the group, if it is in the transaction controls
whether or not that pending update is seen.
Example:
tx1 starts
// Note key1 is in group 1
cache.put(key1, someValue);
Set<K> keys = cache.getGroup("group1");
// The keys would contain key1 if taking part of transaction.
Yes that would be necessary.