On 9 Jul 2009, at 08:57, Galder Zamarreno wrote:
> Manik, for Alph6, what do u think we should be doing? Leave
> useTransitiveDependencies as it is and make modules such as S3 be more
> explicit with their dependencies? Or set it to true?
I'm not fussed which approach we take. They're both kinda hacky
workarounds around Maven's inadequacies either way. :-)
We need a workaround though or otherwise people won't be able for
example to run the demo connecting to S3:
I'll try to resolve this in the next couple of days so that it's ready
for Beta1.
>
> On 06/30/2009 06:04 PM, Adrian Cole wrote:
>> Thanks for writing this up, Galder.
>>
>> The latter seems the better of the two. It may need to be implemented
>> as a
>> separate antscript task, as assembly may not have a hook for this.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Galder Zamarreno<
>> galder.zamarreno(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmmmm, this has a domino effect. Because s3 module depends on
>>> infinispan-core, it now pulls all its dependencies, so we need to
>>> exclude
>>> them somehow, cos they're dependencies of the core module and hence
>>> they
>>> should reside there rather than have them in each and every module.
>>>
>>> Personally, in spite of the repetition, I prefer explicit dependency
>>> definition rather than letting maven bring all transitive
>>> dependencies and
>>> then having to go and do exclusions.
>>>
>>> More globally, I think this needs to be put the infinispan-dev list.
>>> During
>>> assembly, do we either:
>>>
>>> - Leave useTransitiveDependencies as it is, which is false, and make
>>> modules like s3 explicitly define the 3rd party dependencies that
>>> jclouds
>>> depends on.
>>>
>>> - Or set useTransitiveDependencies to true so that they're all
>>> brought in
>>> and exclude direct infinispan-core dependecies from getting to the lib
>>> directories of submodules such as s3.
>>>
>>> For the moment, and to make my life easier getting the demo working,
>>> I'm
>>> using the latter option.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> On 06/30/2009 05:47 PM, Adrian Cole wrote:
>>>
>>>> beware of the assemblies... they are extremely crufty compared to
>>>> ant ;)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Galder Zamarreno<
>>>> galder.zamarreno(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 06/30/2009 05:22 PM, Adrian Cole wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Well.. :) I setup the dependencies of jclouds, so it shouldn't
bring
>>>>>> anything crazy in! Besides, a missing dep might be symptomatic of
a
>>>>>> larger
>>>>>> issue in the distribution assembly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahh, maybe just found the reason why transitive dependencies are
not
>>>>> included:
>>>>>
>>>>> src/main/resources/assemblies/bin.xml:
>>>>>
<useTransitiveDependencies>false</useTransitiveDependencies>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying out with that parameter set to true.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, let me know how it goes.
>>>>>> on the SNAPSHOT bit, it was irrelevant to the topic. no worries
>>>>>> on that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks again for sorting this out, Galder.
>>>>>> -a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Galder Zamarreno<
>>>>>> galder.zamarreno(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/30/2009 05:00 PM, Galder Zamarreno wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/30/2009 04:55 PM, Adrian Cole wrote:
>>>>>>>> many thanks, Galder. It should be a transitive dep from
>>>>>>>> jclouds-s3...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mvn
>>>>>>>>> dependency:tree
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> maybe the distribution isn't pulling in deps
properly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that looks to be the issue. At the moment
I'm trying to
>>>>>>>>> redefine
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> them in the s3 project but maybe there's another way
to do this?
>>>>>>>> Google
>>>>>>>> to the rescue...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmmm, even though it's repetition, I think it might
be safer to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> redefine
>>>>>>> the transitive dependencies rather than let it bring them
all. You
>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>> know what Maven might bring with it...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will be cutting a new beta within the next couple days, so
>>>>>>> maybe you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>> switch temporarily to snapshot to ensure it will
work?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, why would I need a snapshot of jclouds?
I've simply been
>>>>>>>>> adding
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the transitive dependencies manually in s3/pom.xml
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Galder
Zamarreno<
>>>>>>>>> galder.zamarreno(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Adrian,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to make further progress with the demo
and I'm
>>>>>>>>>> encountering the
>>>>>>>>>> following issue:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>>>>>>> org.jclouds.logging.config.LoggingModule
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The list of jars that is distributed does not
include
>>>>>>>>>> jclouds-core-1.0-beta-1.jar and this looks to be
cos there's no
>>>>>>>>>> direct
>>>>>>>>>> dependency on this jar in the pom.xml for the s3
cache store
>>>>>>>>>> module.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> FYI: I'm adding this dependency. I think
there's a similar issue
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> google guice...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, just letting you know of issues as I find
them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See ya,
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Galder Zamarreño
>>>>>>>>>> Sr. Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Galder Zamarreño
>>>>>>> Sr. Software Engineer
>>>>>>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>> Galder Zamarreño
>>>>> Sr. Software Engineer
>>>>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> --
>>> Galder Zamarreño
>>> Sr. Software Engineer
>>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.infinispan.org
http://www.jbosscache.org
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache