Hi Erik,
On 10/11/13 3:30 AM, Erik Salter wrote:
Hi all,
I'm interested in the performance regression,
Which perf regression ? JGRP-1716 ? The diff between using DONT_BUNDLE
and not using it ?
and since I saw a similar
regression with JGroups 3.4.0 coupled with ISPN 5.2.x (until 6.0.x is
ready), I decided to investigate:
Here are some profiling snapshots that I shared with Pedro. This is of my
system running UDP on a 12 node DIST cluster
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50401510/pruvio/dg1_320_interpreted.jps
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50401510/pruvio/dg1_340_interpreted2.jps
The big thing we noticed was that the building of a Message was now in the
main UDP receive() thread instead of the thread pools.
How do you connect this to the regression; and what makes you conclude
that moving the parsing up front is the culprit ? There were many
changes between 3.2 and 3.3/3.4, so why did you pick this one as culprit ?
Looking at your second snapshot, TP.receive() (which does the parsing)
takes almost no time. I've actualy confirmed in my own (extensive) tests
that moving the parsing up made things a bit faster and the code a lot
simpler. It was the latter argument which made me move the parsing from
the pools to receive().
To my poor brain
(and since I haven't been involved in the latest ISPN/JGroups happenings),
it appeared this would be the most likely culprit.
Again, why ? JProfiler (2nd snapshot) shows 4'350ms total for the
receive() method, this is a blip on the radar (0% overall)...
So I reworked the UDP
receiver to be a bit more like 3.2.x with the Message construction done in
the appropriate thread pool (main, OOB, internal), while quasi-punting on
the new bundler implementation. After 3 test runs, the average throughput
(again, measured by my app) seems to have recaptured 50-80% of the
performance degradation. The variance is high enough, though, to give me
pause that I'm on the right track.
Perhaps it is something else. But I'd like to learn what the actual
problem is before diving into it... :-) Time for another skype/webex
session?
Take this FWIW. Thanks.
Erik
-----Original Message-----
From: infinispan-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:infinispan-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mircea Markus
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 3:35 PM
To: infinispan -Dev List
Subject: [infinispan-dev] The windup of 6.0.0
Hi guys,
- 6.0.0.CR2 was added for 16 Oct (Adrian) and 6.0.0.Final was moved to 23
Oct (Dan)
- we have some 20% performance regressions we need to look at before going
final
- I've updated JIRA:
- added tasks for creating documentation and quickstarts
- some JIRAs were moved here
- please follow the JIRA or let me know if there's anything missing:
http://goo.gl/y4Ky7t
Cheers,
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (
http://www.jgroups.org)