Re: [infinispan-dev] DIST.retrieveFromRemoteSource
Doesn't setBlockForResults(false) mean that we're not waiting on a response, and
can proceed to the next message to the next recipient?
On 27 Jan 2012, at 16:34, Dan Berindei wrote:
Manik, Bela, I think we send the requests sequentially as well. In
ReplicationTask.call:
for (Address a : targets) {
NotifyingFuture<Object> f =
sendMessageWithFuture(constructMessage(buf, a), opts);
futureCollator.watchFuture(f, a);
}
In MessageDispatcher.sendMessageWithFuture:
UnicastRequest<T> req=new UnicastRequest<T>(msg, corr, dest,
options);
req.setBlockForResults(false);
req.execute();
Did we use to send each request on a separate thread?
Cheers
Dan
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Bela Ban <bban(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> yes.
>
> On 1/27/12 12:13 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>
>> On 25 Jan 2012, at 09:42, Bela Ban wrote:
>>
>>> No, parallel unicasts will be faster, as an anycast to A,B,C sends the
>>> unicasts sequentially
>>
>> Is this still the case in JG 3.x?
>
>
> --
> Bela Ban
> Lead JGroups (http://www.jgroups.org)
> JBoss / Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org