Re: [infinispan-dev] again: "no physical address"
Apologies for being so late on this thread.
On 1 Feb 2012, at 18:12, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 1 February 2012 16:40, Bela Ban <bban(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Your benchmark is giving me the creeps !
Manik was the original author, I've only been adapting it slightly to
identify performance issues. I wouldn't have used Maven either, but
it's serving me well especially since it turns out I have to
frequently change JGroups version ;-)
Yup, this is why I used Maven here. To be able to easily swap Infinispan and JGroups
versions just by commenting/uncommenting a few lines of XML rather than juggling jar
files.
> I don't think I'll ever switch to this f*cking piece of
shit !
I don't think Maven is to be blamed today! What's wrong?
Anyway one of the nice things of this little benchmark is exactly that
it it's a single class with a main file, so you can just import it in
you IDE and run. Any IDE will pick the correct dependencies, thanks to
Maven. Just that if you do, it will use the default test properties as
hardcoded in the test class org.infinispan.benchmark.Transactional:
please set the same environment variable as bench.sh does, unless you
don't want to run my same configuration.
Yup, again the test is designed to be run via Maven or in your IDE - as Sanne pointed out,
the IDE picks up dependencies from the Maven pom. Further, I also run it using
JProfiler's IntelliJ plugin when I want to profile it.
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org