Hi Pedro,
On 5/29/13 4:41 PM, Pedro Ruivo wrote:
Hi,
I'm adding Bela in CC for a quick question:
We are doing a UnicastRequest and register a FutureListener. The
FutureListener is not being notified if the timeout expires. Is this
normal?
Yes
@Dan: other comments inline
Cheers,
Pedro
On 05/29/2013 03:06 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Pedro Ruivo <pedro(a)infinispan.org
> <mailto:pedro@infinispan.org>> wrote:
>
>
>
> #2 testTimeout() => tests the timeout when a ResponseFilter is
> used. It
> sets the timeout to 1000 milliseconds and sends a command that sleeps
> for 5000 millisecond before reply. This test is failing because no
> TimeoutException was thrown (as expected). That's why I've created
> ISPN-3100.
>
> *question* is the desired behaviour to wait infinitely? If yes, then
> ISPN-3100 is invalid.
>
>
> I'm pretty sure that's not intentional. FutureCollator.futureDone()
> should be called when a UnicastRequest finishes with a TimeoutException
> and it should decrement expectedResponses. When all the UnicastRequests
> are done, it should notify() the caller thread, which should throw a
> TimeoutException.
The problem is the FutureCollactor is not receiving any notification
about the any timeout. So I think we have to check for the timeout
expiration in the FutureCollactor (if the answer from Bela is "yes").
>
> #3 testTimeoutWithoutFilter() => tests the timeout without a filter.
> It's working correctly!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Pedro
>
> [1]
>
>
https://github.com/pruivo/infinispan/commit/1fc26d740b773bf3864298615f61c...
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (
http://www.jgroups.org)