Re: [infinispan-dev] Re: property tags in configuration files

Hey, We want to use these annotations to create infinispan configuration option documentation directly from the source code as well as to read XML config files and populate corresponding configuration beans with xml data. If we go with expressive annotations we would end up with many many annotations.... On 6/20/09 1:11 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > Guys, String based parameters are as much XML than well XML. > Can't you create nice clean expressive annotations > > @InfinispanConfig > public @interface ListenerExecutor { > int maxThread() default 5; > String theadNamePrefix() default ""; > } > > etc > > On Jun 19, 2009, at 13:31, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > >> Mircea, >> >> I use this annotation to denote property: >> >> @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) >> @Target( { ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.FIELD }) >> public @interface ConfigurationProperty { >> String parentElement(); >> String name(); >> String description() default ""; >> } >> >> So you can annotate any method to denote a certain property. If >> you need to annotate more than one property you can use >> >> >> @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) >> @Target( { ElementType.METHOD}) >> public @interface ConfigurationProperties { >> ConfigurationProperty [] elements(); >> } >> >> >> We can annotate those methods with multiple properties >> >> @ConfigurationProperties(elements = { >> @ConfigurationProperty(name = "maxThreads", >> parentElement = "asyncListenerExecutor"), >> @ConfigurationProperty(name = "threadNamePrefix", >> parentElement = "asyncListenerExecutor") }) >> public void setAsyncListenerExecutorProperties(Properties >> asyncListenerExecutorProperties) { >> testImmutability("asyncListenerExecutorProperties"); >> this.asyncListenerExecutorProperties = >> toTypedProperties(asyncListenerExecutorProperties); >> } >> >> and any of those simple ones as well.... >> >> >> Anything wrong with this simple approach? >> >> >> >> >> On 6/19/09 11:58 AM, Mircea Markus wrote: >>> Continuing a conversation Vladimir and I had on irc, about how >>> <property> tags can be be listed in the documentation. >>> >>> <property> are a way to configure extension points (e.g. >>> CacheStore implementations, ScheduledExecutorFactory >>> implemetations etc), e.g: >>> >>> <replicationQueueScheduledExecutor >>> factory="org.infinispan.executors.DefaultScheduledExecutorFactory"> >>> <property name="threadNamePrefix" value="ReplicationQueueThread"/> >>> </replicationQueueScheduledExecutor> >>> >>> "threadNamePrefix" property is specific to >>> DefaultScheduledExecutorFactory, other implementations of >>> ScheduledExecutorFactory would not recognize it, and/or use >>> different properties. >>> So there's no way to handle "property" tags as the other >>> 'regular' attributes that map to fixed configuration elements: >>> e.g. transportClass maps to GlobalConfiguration#transportClass etc. >>> Even more, in some situations these properties are not being used >>> to call setters on the target objects, but are being passed all >>> together through a java.util.Properties: which makes them >>> impossible/harder to annotate. >>> >>> On the other hand it would be very nice to have all the >>> properties of default extension points (e.g. FileCacheStore, >>> JdbcStringBasedCacheStore etc) having all the documentation >>> exposed through annotations. >>> A possible way I see to make this working is: >>> 1) create a new annotation to denote an extension point, >>> @ExtenssionPoint(defaultImplementations={ClassName1, ClassName2, >>> ClassName3}) >>> e.g. >>> >>> CacheLoaderConfig >>> { @ExtenssionPoint >>> (defaultImplementations={FileCacheStore.class, >>> JdbcStringBasedCacheStore.class}) //this will break module >>> dependency, guess strings should be used >>> void setCacheLoaderClassName(String s); >>> } >>> >>> 2) For all existing extension points the tool will create a >>> different table containing all its specific properties, obtained >>> by parsing class's @Property tags >>> >>> 3) Make all the current extension points that use >>> java.util.Property are replace by setters that can be annotated: >>> this way we would remain consistent in all code, and IMHO the >>> code would be more readable >>> >>> wdyt? >>> Cheers, >>> Mircea >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >