Re: [infinispan-dev] Distributed execution framework - update

On 1 Mar 2011, at 18:07, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > I want to roughly outline what I believe needs to be done to implement > basic distributed > execution framework for 5.0 Final. > > If you recall, Distributed/MapReduce task is a logical work unit > consisting of multiple distributed > executables executed individually across Infinispan cluster. Each > individual task execution > on Infinispan cluster is governed by failover, load balancing and > execution policies. > > Failover policy > > Failover policy regulates how and if distributed task executables are > migrated to > backup execution nodes in case of failure. > > Executable can fail due to: > > - exception raised in task implementation during execution > - node crash/leave > - migration failure to/from target execution node > > Infinispan will invoke failover mechanism in all above cases except when > exception > is raised by task executable itself. Exception will be returned to > invoker of > distributed task who can act upon it. > > By default, there will be two failover policies: failover off, and > failover on. > If failover is on load balancing policy in place will decide where to > migrate > task executable for execution. In case failure is off task invoker will > be notified. Hmm - tasks may fail for various reasons, including a badly written task which may always fail. Maybe all you need is a simple retry count? > Load balancing policy > > Load balancing policy decides how distributed task executables are > dispersed for > execution around Infinispan cluster. By default data collocating load > balancing > policy is used as soon as distributed task is invoked on a set of keys > in cache. > Other, simpler, load balancing policies can be implemented as well if a > need arises. I don't understand - I thought tasks are executed on all data owners (if any keys are provided) or on all nodes if no keys are provided. What other "load balancing" policies do you foresee? :-) If it doesn't make sense maybe it would be better to remove load balancing from the API for now, add it later if we see a need? > Execution policy > > Execution policy decides how task executable is executed once it has > been migrated > to an execution node. By default priority queue is used for queuing of > execution > task executables. Users can, if needed, fine-tune task priority on per > task basis. > If priority is not changed for all tasks then all their executables are > effectively > queued fifo on execution nodes. > > Time permitting, job stealing policy should be implemented taking into > account ideas > from fork/join framework and applying it in a distributed fashion > amongst Infinispan > nodes. I would say leave prioritising out for now. Lets keep this simple. This is all stuff that can be added later if needed. > Implementation sketches > > > In order to implement distributed/mapreduce task execution I believe we > should reuse > existing Infinispan infrastructure (marshalling, remote command > invocation, interceptor > chain, thread pools) as much as possible. > > As user submits distributed task we would locate Infinispan nodes where > the input keys > are located and send executables (DistributedCallable/Mapper/Reducer) to > those nodes > using exisiting remote command invocation mechanism. Decision about > migration of > executables is effectively done by load balancing policy, the default > one being > collocating policy. > > When executables wrapped into commands arrive to Infinispan nodes they > are handed > off to a special handling object (execution policy) rather than > invocation handler. Why? If you are creating a special Command for this, the Command's perform() method could handle execution. Saves you having to re-engineer the InvocationHandler (which is very complex as it is). > Execution policy interacts with execution container and in turn queues > and monitors > executables as they are executed in container's thread pool. > DistributedCallable(s) are > invoked and results returned to invoking node. Mappers are invoked as > well and their > results handed off to Reducers as described in mapreduce algorithm. > Eventually a > result of each Reducer is also returned to task invoker and in turn > Collator is invoked. > > In case of task failure due to exception raised in task itself, > exception is returned to > task submitter. Yes, the Command's perform() method would just have to throw an exception. The InvocationHandler will wrap it in an appropriate ExceptionResponse to me sent back to the caller. > In other cases, failover policy along with load > balancing policy decides > how to migrate executable to other Infinispan nodes. > > > If you think that I omitted something and/or have suggestion let me know. > > Regards, > Vladimir > > > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- Manik Surtani manik(a)jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev