On 13 Jun 2013, at 09:24, Radim Vansa <rvansa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Seems that it's somewhat better (6050 writes/s) but not at the
previous level.
what about the reads?
I am trying to cherry-pick it directly on the commit that failed it
and see where is the difference, then maybe I'll have to generate alternative branch
with ISPN-3221 commit after ISPN-2848 73da108cdcf9db4f3edbcd6dbda6938d6e45d148 and iterate
to next regression origin.
+1.
Pedro: I've noticed that in JGroupsTransport:577 you're changing the third
parameter of CommandAwareRpcDispatcher.constructMessage from false (as found in
113842c8cf91cbb5a1bbd26e05fab7024fdec081) to true (as appears in later commits), is this
desired?
That has been changed on purpose to be true later on when fixing: ISPN-3043: Make
synchronous backup calls use the OOB thread pool.
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)