Re: [infinispan-dev] Design change in Infinispan Query
On Feb 25, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> On 24 févr. 2014, at 17:39, Mircea Markus
<mmarkus(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 17, 2014, at 10:13 PM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
>>
>> By the way, Mircea, Sanne and I had quite a long discussion about this one and
the idea of one cache per entity. It turns out that the right (as in easy) solution does
involve a higher level programming model like OGM provides. You can simulate it yourself
using the Infinispan APIs but it is just cumbersome.
>
> Curious to hear the whole story :-)
> We cannot mandate all the suers to use OGM though, one of the reasons being OGM is
not platform independent (hotrod).
Then solve all the issues I have raised with a magic wand and come back to me when you
have done it, I'm interested.
People are going to use infinispan with one cache per entity, because it makes sense:
- different config (repl/dist | persistent/non-persistent) for different data types
- have map/reduce tasks running only the Person entires not on Dog as well, when you want
to select (Person) where age > 18
I don't see a reason to forbid this, on the contrary. The way I see it the relation
between (OGM, ISPN) <=> (Hibernate, JDBC). Indeed OGM would be a better abstraction
and should be recommended as such for the Java clients, but ultimately we're a general
purpose storage engine that is available to different platforms as well.
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)