Indeed adding the DONT_BUNDLE flag back and using the new bundler yielded the same
performance as the old setup.
Interesting enough, using the DONT_BUNDLE + old bundler made performance not look good.
Radim can provide the exact numbers.
On 25 Jun 2013, at 16:37, Bela Ban <bban(a)redhat.com> wrote:
So the new bundler is always *faster* than the old one. And ISPN-3221
seems to fix the degradation. Do I still need to look into this ?
On 6/13/13 12:43 PM, Radim Vansa wrote:
>
> | > Seems that it's somewhat better (6050 writes/s) but not at the previous
> | > level.
> | what about the reads?
>
> After Pedro's question I have tried to run ISPN-3221 fix with both old an new
bundler (in configuration), and the result pretty surprises me as there should not be much
of a difference (as all messages that are part of the test should be OOB =>
DONT_BUNDLE).
>
> 113842c8cf91cbb5a1bbd26e05fab7024fdec081 (last OK build)
> new bundler: 1.5M reads/s, 7800 writes/s
> old bundler: 1.3M reads/s, 4300 writes/s
>
> 73da108cdcf9db4f3edbcd6dbda6938d6e45d148 (removing DONT_BUNDLE)
> new bundler: 1.2M reads/s, 4800 writes/s
> old bundler: 150k reads/s, 250 writes/s
>
> ISPN-3221 fix (Pedro's branch)
> new bundler: 1.5M reads/s, 6050 writes/s
> old bundler: 1.3M reads/s, 3100 writes/s
>
> ISPN-3221 cherry-picked onto 73da108cdcf9db4f3edbcd6dbda6938d6e45d148
> new bundler: 1.5M reads/s, 7800 writes/s
> old bundler: 1.3M reads/s, 4300 writes/s
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (
http://www.jgroups.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)