Re: [infinispan-dev] mixing optimistic and explicit locking

> Since it turns out quite often to explain "weird things" to users > about batching that it is in fact just a DummyTransaction, maybe it > should be better to remove the current batching API and have people > deal explicitly with transactions (in all it's aspects from usage, > expectations and configuration). Yes, this becomes a separate subject I suppose. Is there a need for a batching API at all, won't transactions be sufficient?