On 18 May 2011, at 11:43, Manik Surtani wrote:
On 18 May 2011, at 11:38, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Just a curiosity - I'm not sure yet I would use it - would this work
> across different caches?
> So if I have cacheA and cacheB, both using some form of distribution,
> could I have some object stored in cacheA, some other stored in
> cacheB, and use grouping to have them stored in the same nodes ?
Assuming they both have the same number of nodes, numOwners, ConsistentHash
implementation and hash algorithm, etc. configured, then I presume so.
I think so to.