Re: [infinispan-dev] Dist.exec failover

On 23 Oct 2012, at 17:54, Manik Surtani wrote: > > On 23 Oct 2012, at 17:17, Vladimir Blagojevic <vblagoje(a)redhat.com > <mailto:vblagoje@redhat.com>> wrote: > >> On 12-10-23 11:40 AM, Mircea Markus wrote: >>> >>> The main reason for passing the keys is in order to calculate the >>> locality of the task based on consistent hash. We don't have a >>> reference to the consistent hash in the DistributedTaskFailoverPolicy, >>> so not sure this would be useful as it is. >>> >> You are right Mircea. But we can put CH in FailoverContext if needed :-) > > And make CH a part of the public API?:/ It is reachable through the advancedCache.