Re: [infinispan-dev] PR labels

Hello people, I'd like to rationalize the PR labels because I believe some of them are useless: [Ready for review] - Any PR without the [Preview] label must fall under this category [Backport] - The burden should be on the PR owner to create relevant backport PRs, not on the reviewer [Wait CI Results] - PRs should only be integrated after a successful CI run (or when failures can be proven to be pre-existing) [Check CI Failures!] - The CI runs already add failure/success to the PR status. Checking CI failures should apply to ALL PRs. [On Ice] PR should be closed and reopened when relevant again. Comments/suggestions ? Tristan