Could you please be a bit more specific ?
Are there any test to confirm the closing of the bug ?
Is it in trunk ?
That sounds like a really good news ;-)
phil
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Galder Zamarreno<galder(a)jboss.org> wrote:
> This is done now.
>
> On 01/26/2010 01:10 PM, Amin Abbaspour wrote:
>> Created
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/ISPN-340
>> You can vote.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Sanne Grinovero
>> <sanne.grinovero(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1
>>> I don't know if it's correct to consider it a bug, but choices on
JIRA
>>> are limited.
>>> I would really need this - performance impact is high - and hope they
>>> could fix it before 4.0
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sanne
>>>
>>> 2010/1/26 Amin Abbaspour<a.abbaspour(a)gmail.com>:
>>>> Yes Philippe, I think it is a bug.
>>>>
>>>> This totally ruins all attempts to create a write-behind async store.
>>>> I don't know if JBoss Cache had the same issue or not, but for many
>>>> use-cases (including ours) one will need both TX and write-behind
>>>> simultaneously.
>>>>
>>>> OK, I will open a bug in Jira for 4.0.0-GA.
>>>>
>>>> Amin
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Philippe Van
Dyck<pvdyck(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>>>> Sounds like a good idea.
>>>>> How do you qualify it ? Bug ? (perf) Improvement ?
>>>>> It has a major impact on performance when using the S3 CacheStore,
so
> I
>>>>> would like it to be a "performance bug".
>>>>> WDYT ... especially regarding the planning of the next release ?
>>>>> Phil
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Amin Abbaspour<
> a.abbaspour(a)gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should I open a jira task for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Amin Abbaspour<
> a.abbaspour(a)gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I guess this is a somehow a bug or typo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Transactions and stores are two separate concepts. While it
sounds
> to
>>>>>>> flush to normal store at the TX commit but when one knowingly
sets
>>>>>>> store as async, he accepts the risk of consistence in favor
of
> speed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I expect this to be fixed (or at least discussed) before GA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Philippe Van
Dyck<pvdyck(a)gmail.com
>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I do confirm this behavior.
>>>>>>>> Transactions and asynchronous updates may seem
antagonistic, but
> they
>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> not on a multi-level cache.
>>>>>>>> I plan to use a synchronous transactional disk cache and
a second
> non
>>>>>>>> transactional asynchronous s3 cache, to get the best of
both
> worlds.
>>>>>>>> Since the asynchronous aspect of the s3 cache will not
allow me to
> get
>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>> feedback (aka Future), I want it to
'write-behind' in the
> background
>>>>>>>> (and
>>>>>>>> hope everything goes well).
>>>>>>>> I will wait for the qi4j v1 release (probably Monday),
adapt
> infinispan
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> the blobstore of jClouds and take a closer look at this
in a couple
> of
>>>>>>>> weeks.
>>>>>>>> Phil
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Amin Abbaspour
>>>>>>>> <a.abbaspour(a)gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regarding
>>>>>>>>>
>
http://community.jboss.org/wiki/Write-ThroughAndWrite-BehindCaching
>>>>>>>>> , Even if Syncer is in Async mode, but if we modify a
key inside a
>>>>>>>>> transaction boundary it is always stored
synchronously! Why is it
> so?
>>>>>>>>> How can I have both locking and async store. FYI I
use JBossTM
>>>>>>>>> Standalone.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Amin Abbaspour
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Galder ZamarreƱo
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder ZamarreƱo
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache