That should not prevent you from running your own tests. Maybe that
software was created with a different use case in mind...
On 27/09/16 11:35, Sebastian Laskawiec wrote:
Ouch :( The article looked promising :D
Thanks a lot for checking!
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Bela Ban <bban(a)redhat.com
<mailto:bban@redhat.com>> wrote:
I already ran an experiment, replacing the default executor we have in
JGroups. The result was abysmally slow and the executor used a LOT of
CPU, bringing things almost to a standstill.
Looking at the code, they're using a lot of busy waiting/spinning
On 26/09/16 13:31, Sebastian Laskawiec wrote:
> Just stumbled upon -
>
https://dzone.com/articles/a-new-high-throughput-java-executor-service
<
https://dzone.com/articles/a-new-high-throughput-java-executor-service>
>
> Project's web page:
http://executorservice.org/
> Sources:
https://github.com/vmlens/executor-service
<
https://github.com/vmlens/executor-service>
>
> Maybe that's something we could experiment with?
>
> Thanks
> Sebastian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev>
>
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (
http://www.jgroups.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev>
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev