Re: [infinispan-dev] X-datacentre replication: design suggestions
On 2/13/12 4:59 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
> This use case cannot be supported by option #3 AFAICS: the
bridge
> between LON and SFO is completely asynchronous and doesn't know
> anything
> about sync or async RPCs, so TX2 can be applied in SFO before TX1.
Why can't the bridge send the messages in the order in which they were enqueued?
It *does* deliver the messages in the order in which they were sent. I
was referring to the async case in general: commits from different nodes
hit the bridge in an undefined order; in your example it could be TX1
--> TX2 or TX2 --> TX1.
(Note that I mixed up option #2 and option #1 in my previous email)
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups (http://www.jgroups.org)
JBoss / Red Hat