Re: [infinispan-dev] Comments on tutorials etc.

On 19 Jan 2011, at 15:11, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > >> On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: >> >>> On 18 Jan 2011, at 16:17, Pete Muir wrote: >>>> >>>> 12) http://community.jboss.org/wiki/InfinispanInteractiveTutorialwithScala >>>> >>>> For "Cache with Transaction Management" I was not seeing TX semantics being obeyed, I saw the size increment as a added key-value pairs which cache operation? I imagine the size only increments within the transaction context? i.e. if you suspend the uncommitted transaction and run the same operation again, you don't see transaction's modifications.

>>> >>> Galder, this as well? >> >> I'll check it out. > > I created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-882 - This behaviour is like this since since we accepted (Mircea?) the following community bug report: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-679 > > Can we get an agreement on this? I think it should work as it did originally. You mean cache.values()? should not be tx aware? I think it should be consistent with all the other ops, like put, get etc. (which are tx aware). _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev