Hmmmm, I see what you mean now. Just to be clear, if the remote and local cache names were
really different, it'd be like this, right?
https://gist.github.com/3786481
Now, what about this option instead?
https://gist.github.com/3786484
The main difference is that you'd have to type the remoteCache is as many sites that
are not LON, but even though it's a bit more verbose in the other nodes/sites, it
seems easier to understand.
Cheers,
On Sep 24, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Mircea Markus <mircea.markus(a)jboss.com> wrote:
The "users" cache is in LON:
https://gist.github.com/3776470
and backups its data to NYC:
https://gist.github.com/3776502
On 24 Sep 2012, at 16:09, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>
>> On 20 Sep 2012, at 11:02, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>
>>> Why do you need the backupFor element? I mean, take this example:
>>>
https://gist.github.com/3754542
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be much simpler to merge both backup and backupFor elements?
i.e.
>>>
https://gist.github.com/3754550
>>>
>>> For starters, I don't have to type LON twice :)
>> I'd rather configure the name of the backup cache in its own site: e.g. if
the backup for "users"@LON was "c1@NYC"
>
> ^ In the current config, assuming this is the config in LON, it'd be something
like this, right?
https://gist.github.com/3776426
>
>> and now we want to change it to "c2"@NYC I'd rather not have to
change configs in LON but only in NYC.
>
> Well, as far as I understand, even in your current configuration you have to do so:
>
https://gist.github.com/3776440
>
> So, I don't understand your point :( - can you provide some tangible XML examples
of what you mean?
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder(a)redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz
Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io
Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org