ah, ok, got you
On 12/16/10 4:29 PM, Paul Ferraro wrote:
Yes, we still support ATTRIBUTE granularity.
The replication granularity levels are not all semantically equivalent.
ATTRIBUTE granularity is not an appropriate fallback for FIELD because
unlike FIELD and SESSION granularity, ATTRIBUTE granularity does
preserve inter-attribute object references. An application that relied
on this behavior could break otherwise.
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 22:36 +0100, Bela Ban wrote:
> - "An application configured with FIELD granularity web session
> replication will automatically fallback (with a log warning) to SESSION
> granularity": don't we support ATTRIBUTE granularity anymore ? And if
> so, why wouldn't we fall back to ATTRIBUTE granularity ?
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
JBoss