New annotations are @ConfigurationDoc and @ConfigurationDocRef. If interested have a look
at how Configuration.java and GlobalCofiguration.java are annotated on 4.2 branch.
Cheers
On 2010-09-14, at 7:39 AM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
Yeah perfect. I would just call your ProgrammaticSetter a
ConfigurationReference. We also need to add "name" annotation field just as we
had it in @configRef. A couple of annotation fields in ConfigurationReference annotation
should be able to handle all these cases of naming elements, direct comments insertion or
picking comments up from somewhere else etc etc
Cheers,
Vladimir
On 2010-09-14, at 1:04 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
> Essentially the crux of the problem is that we currently use the Configuration bean
for programmatic configuration. Setters are Javadoc'd accordingly. E.g., this setter
enables invocation batching and is Javadocced accordingly.
>
> Configuration#setInvocationBatching():
>
>
http://pastie.org/1157879
>
> Now this makes use of an internal component to actually hold the value. It is done
this way so that the JAXB schema generator and parser can handle properly formatted XML
equivalents.
>
> The ConfigDoc stuff that Vladimir wrote earlier grabs additional docs from these
internal components to generate the XML config reference guide:
>
>
http://docs.jboss.org/infinispan/4.1/apidocs/config.html
>
> In this case, we'd be looking at the <invocationbatching ...> element:
>
>
http://docs.jboss.org/infinispan/4.1/apidocs/config.html#ce_default_invoc...
>
> These docs are generated from notes made on the JAXB beans annotated with custom
@configRef Javadoc annotations:
>
>
http://pastie.org/1157880
>
> The problem here is that we are repeating ourselves. And that leads to poor and
inconsistent documentation at first, and completely unmaintained documentation as time
goes on. :)
>
> So my proposal is as such:
>
> * We document setters on Configuration and GlobalConfiguration *really* well.
> * We reference these setters from internal components such as
Configuration.InvocationBatching.setEnabled() using annotations. E.g.,
http://pastie.org/1157888
> * When generating config docs, we have a reference to the actual setter thanks to
this annotation, and can use it to grab the "real" Javadocs for this setting and
add it to the XML config reference.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Cheers
> Manik
>
>
>
> On 14 Sep 2010, at 11:51, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Manik and I talked privately regarding this topic through
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-626 and we concluded that we could use some input from
people that have used configuration reference markers within Infinispan code etc. Manik
basically had a few ideas where he wanted to polish/expand the final look of configuration
reference (summed up in ISPN-626) and upon closer inspection I think that we need to
rework configuration markers to make things simpler and easier to use.
>>
>> One of the things I wanted to do is replace javadoc tag @configRef with
annotation(s) and use pure comment text of javadoc elements as input for both javadoc and
configuration reference. So lets gather some more ideas, and I'll work on this on a
side whenever I need the break from hard core stuff :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Vladimir
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vladimir Blagojevic
>> JBoss Clustering Team
>> JBoss, by Red Hat
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Manik Surtani
> manik(a)jboss.org
> Lead, Infinispan
> Lead, JBoss Cache
>
http://www.infinispan.org
>
http://www.jbosscache.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Vladimir Blagojevic
JBoss Clustering Team
JBoss, by Red Hat
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev