----- "Mircea Markus" <mircea.markus(a)jboss.com&gt; wrote: > On 9 Jun 2010, at 10:13, galder(a)redhat.com wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> This came to my mind while sleeping. > You definitely over-geeked me! >> While I was profiling the Hot Rod server, I noticed that some time > (3%) was being used reading the string cache name from the wire and > transforming it to UTF-8. > How much of the time is being used to convert the byte[] to utf 8 > String? At least for writes we can use an cached byte[] rather than > converting it each time. About half. 1.5% reading the byte array and 1.5% converting it to UTF-8. The problem is that I need to get a cache out of it, so somehow you need to map that byte[] to the cache that it maps to. I have doubts whether creating a UTF-8 string and then getting a cache out of it is worse than having to maintain a mapping between byte[] and the target cache.

>> >> Now, in the test I was acting against the default cache which we had > established to be requests sent to "___defaultcache" would be > considered to be directed to the default cache. However, I'm thinking > that this is waste of space. We could make things even quicker when > default cache is used by simply assuming that if the length of the > String is 0, followed by nothing, then the default cache will be used. > If a length other than 0 is passed, the String follows and we have to > read it. > +1 I've created: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-489 >> >> WDYT? >> -- >> Galder Zamarreño >> Sr. Software Engineer >> Infinispan, JBoss Cache > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev