On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)infinispan.org> wrote:
The concurrency-interest mailing list mentioned a bug in the CHMv8
which could cause data loss, apparently a fix was applied already but
I guess this doesn't magically appear in the Infinispan sources.
I spotted that I already created a jira for it, a few days back :)
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3178
I didn't create a JIRA as I haven't been able to look if the
issue
affects our copy, or how critical it is, but I guess someone should
have a look at it as "data loss" doesn't sound too good; please could
someone take this over and create one as needed as I'll be offline
most of the next days.
In this case I've been lucky to spot the discussion,
^ You're not the only one reading that mailing list :)
but could we
think of a better process to track the upstream code changes? Also it
would be nice to catch these problems first, apparently others are
doing more in-depth tests :-)
Sanne
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder(a)redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz
Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io
Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org