and if it fails with a really great error message, like "you updated a component
which can not be at runtime restarted, please restart you instance" You would win
the prize for best usability ever. ;)
Jim Tyrrell
Senior JBoss Solutions Architect
Did you see RHT on CNBC's Mad Money?
http://www.cnbc.com/id/39401056
On May 5, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
I know this thread, but I think it's worth correcting a
misconception here.
On 26 Apr 2011, at 08:17, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 13:49 +0200, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> You would rather have the server out of the box be TCK compliant
>> than usable for development ? I thought we were pass the mistakes
>> made in latest AS and EAP being targeted purely for production ?
>
> The dev scenario I described using a marker (or the equivalent API call
> to trigger a redeploy) seems far more sustainable, even if it takes a
> bit more time (framework init, etc).
Application developers do not care about sustainability. They care about turnaround and
development time.
Operations guys care about sustainability.
This update-without-redeploy stuff is really important, and I've seen this
misunderstanding before with concerns like "well the update will not always
succeed" - in development this does not matter one bit. If it the update fails, you
simply restart the AS and it starts working again.
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev