It sounds like it might be on our best interest to just leave it then.
The effort to support the code in the subsystem is not that difficult. I
was just more concerned with having non-conventional operation names in
the subsystem and making it confusing in the CLI.
On 11/09/2011 01:47 AM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
While I don't entirely like that so late in the game,
I can live with it. For us it makes it more complicated
to support 7.0 and 7.1 and EAP. While EAP is prio1,
if it makes it into 7.1 it should be ok, as 7.1 will be freely
available as well.
Heiko
--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat