Overriding descriptors is essentially a JSR 88 functionality. So
cracking open artifacts is not required.
Fixing content is orthogonal to JSR 88.
Hence a combined solution that can make sense.
Carlo
On 04/05/2012 11:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
I actually agree with you here on the fact that deployment
descriptors is really the last thing I would like to override.
I see much more relevance in fixing graphics or html content this way - but i'll let
Brian outline what the specifics
of the user/customer requests have been.
/max
> Are you sure that this truly reflects what most users want? Are you not just
> adding a lot of complexity to cater for the whim of a small group of users?
> From what I can gather from this thread, the motivation for these overrides
> are rather thin. It is based on some users having a "policy" to not
> break-open deployment artefacts. How overriding is better or safer that
> "breaking open" escapes me at the moment.
>
> Very much part of the EJB specification is the definition of roles and
> responsibilities. As you know, it describes a definite role for composing
> (and by implication "breaking-open" to recompose) artefacts. If your
> configuration is too dynamic for this approach then it is a matter of
> application design to pick this up from elsewhere (DB or properties file).
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jboss-as7-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:jboss-as7-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Max Rydahl
> Andersen
> Sent: 05 April 2012 10:22 AM
> To: Carlo de Wolf
> Cc: jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [jboss-as7-dev] Overriding Deployment Descriptors
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>
>> On 04/04/2012 05:01 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> And all this override would be via management API's, not doable with any
> deployment-scanner operations?
>>> i.e. can I do something like:
>>>
>>> cd overridestuff
>>> cp * to
>>> /data/contents/xyz.war/
>>>
>>>
>>> now xyz.war has an "incomplete" override of xyz.war which will be
>>> "overlayed" on to deployment named xyz.war (independent on wether
it
>>> comes from deployment scanner or management api)
>>>
>>> or is it all just via management api's that would need to be executed on
> every restart/change to the data/contents folder ?
>>> /max
>>>
>> How about?
>>
>> standalone/deployments/xyz.war.part01/
>> standalone/deployments/xyz.war.part02/
>> standalone/deployments/xyz.war.part03/
>>
>> touch standalone/deployments/xyz.war.dodeploy
> I like that but I thought these were ment to be put in a separate location
> than /deployments ? (if not then +1)
>
> /max
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>