Re: [jboss-as7-dev] json vs custom parser
I dunno I think this would be more work than just writing a trivial
little JS marshaller. I think changing the native Java API to
accommodate GWT is taking it too far - I mean we're talking about making
these things not serializable.
On 02/02/2011 10:20 AM, Jason T. Greene wrote:
That's an interesting idea. If nothing else we could use GWT to
port it
javascript once, implement the IO bits in native javascript, and then
maintain the whole thing as just a javascript library. Then you could
use JSNI to talk to it.
Initally I am doing JSON over HTTP, but we could also do binary-dmr over
HTTP following this approach. We could use a simple http header to
indicate the need for the binary response.
On 2/2/11 3:37 AM, Heiko Braun wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to decouple the marshalling components from the raw model?
> This would allow us to re-use ModelNode, etc directly in GWT without having to write
> another parallel hierarchy. The problems in this case are the imports on java.io, etc
that the GWT
> compiler chokes on.
>
> Ike
>
> On Feb 2, 2011, at 2:27 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>
>> It's in ModelNode (readExternal and writeExternal).
>>
>> On 02/01/2011 07:14 PM, Scott Stark wrote:
>>> Where are the binary protocol handlers located?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
--
- DML