Kabir, what exactly is admin mode? Is it the same server profile but
with controls on communication from clients?
The problem is that you're replacing a dead server (no communication
channels) with a live server in admin mode (with live communication
channels). So IIUC, you depend on the admin mode working correctly to
block communications from the outside. Also, if JGroups detected failed
group members using a standard OS ping mechanism (which it doesn't),
then this could change JGroups view of failed vs non-failed hosts - that
is, if admin mode did not also block pings.
On 03/08/2012 11:28 AM, Radoslav Husar wrote:
On 03/06/2012 06:34 PM, Kabir Khan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had a vague thought. I'm not familiar with the clustering tests
> bit from a glance there seems to be a lot of stopping and starting of
> servers going on? These tests run very slowly, so if all this
Hi Kabir,
Thanks for the tough. Yes that is true and surely does contribute to the
slowness.
The reason for the lots of stopping is because we need to use manual
containers (for simulating failover, state transfer, undeploy,
singleton, etc). The containers are set to manual mode and unmanaged
deployments.
Unfortunately, this currently means that the containers are stopped
after *each* test class and then started again. ARQ does this. We would
also need to be able to order the test class executions. Most of these
cases (currently all) the running container could be re-used (even
though we shut it down in the middle of the test).
For this we would probably need support in Arquillian. (class order +
dont turn off container after class?) Aslak, WDYT?
> stopping/starting is contributing to the slowness, it could be an
> idea to explore changing the container so that
>
> stop -> executes a reload on the server so that it is reloaded in
> admin-only mode start -> executes a reload on the server so that is
> is reloaded in 'normal' mode
>
> Radoslav, do you see any issues with this?
How would this actually work? Use auto containers and use stop and start
to simulate up and down without having to do any fix in ARQ? Hmhm, thats
interesting.
This would however prohibit use of stop by kill or custom "kill" and
probably use of different container confs as well.
However, this seems to me too much of a workaround (for instance the
server's JVM never shuts down).
Rado
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev