Re: [jboss-as7-dev] Security Domain Association

Using a common annotation sounds good but a down side is that the annotation shares the package with a set of other annotations we do not support - users my inadvertently think these are supported as well. Regards, Darran Lofthouse. On 06/10/2011 05:09 PM, Marcus Moyses wrote: > I think it would be a good idea to use the same annotation for servlets > too. > If the EJB3 team is ok with using PB's annotation I can take a look at > integration it with servlets > > On 06/10/2011 01:06 PM, Darran Lofthouse wrote: >> On 06/10/2011 05:03 PM, Marcus Moyses wrote: >>>> i.e. Specifying the<security-domain> element in the deployment >>>> descriptors or using the SecurityDomain annotation on specific beans. >>> Yes, the<security-domain> element is still used, at least in WARs. I >>> think it should be used for EARs as well. >>> There is SecurityDomain annotation in the PicketBox project but it has >>> never been used for EJB3s. I think we should start using it to avoid >>> having 2 different annotations. Customers get confused with that. >>>> Has there been any consideration regarding assigning a security >>>> domain >>>> as part of the actual deployment process i.e. deploy this archive and >>>> use domain X. >> >> Is there any plan to use this annotation with servlets? >