Re: [jboss-as7-dev] JBAS-9373, need control of what interfaces/ports are bound to

Nope I misread and was wrong; the address is not configurable, it's hard coded: return new ServerSocket(port, 0, InetAddress.getByName(null)); Which makes sense, the whole intent of that class is to ensure uniqueness on the machine and that's impossible if different processes use different addresses. Finding a better way to do this is a long-standing issue. On 4/21/11 12:33 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote: > I have a feeling this is a 1 line fix; give me a minute. It's pulling > the port from the socket config, just not the address. > > On 4/21/11 12:18 PM, Scott Stark wrote: >> I created this bug, now changed to an enhancement request: >> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-9373 >> >> to deal with the tm layer binding to an anonymous port on the 127.0.0.1 >> interface as a means to obtain a system wide unique number. How this is >> done is not exposed via the domain model, and when running in an selinux >> (secured linux) environment we need control over what interfaces/ports >> are bound to, where files are written, etc. to be able to write the >> correct selinux policy. >> >> Do we need, or already have a id service that can be leveraged here? It >> looks like the arjuna Uid class that is used generates a 28 byte/224 bit >> value. >> >> The main issue is that any subsystem has to express what privileged >> resources it is making use of through the domain model. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jboss-as7-dev mailing list >> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev >