> On Apr 5, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>
>> Overriding descriptors is essentially a JSR 88 functionality.
> I'm curious, what are the usecases in JSR 88 for this ?
You tell the DeploymentManager to distribute the given module with an alternate
deployment plan.
how does that affect any descriptors in the archive ?
/max
Carlo
>
> /max
>
>> So cracking open artifacts is not required.
>>
>> Fixing content is orthogonal to JSR 88.
>>
>> Hence a combined solution that can make sense.
>>
>> Carlo
>>
>> On 04/05/2012 11:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> I actually agree with you here on the fact that deployment descriptors is
really the last thing I would like to override.
>>> I see much more relevance in fixing graphics or html content this way - but
i'll let Brian outline what the specifics
>>> of the user/customer requests have been.
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>>> Are you sure that this truly reflects what most users want? Are you not
just
>>>> adding a lot of complexity to cater for the whim of a small group of
users?
>>>> From what I can gather from this thread, the motivation for these
overrides
>>>> are rather thin. It is based on some users having a "policy" to
not
>>>> break-open deployment artefacts. How overriding is better or safer that
>>>> "breaking open" escapes me at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> Very much part of the EJB specification is the definition of roles and
>>>> responsibilities. As you know, it describes a definite role for
composing
>>>> (and by implication "breaking-open" to recompose) artefacts. If
your
>>>> configuration is too dynamic for this approach then it is a matter of
>>>> application design to pick this up from elsewhere (DB or properties
file).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: jboss-as7-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> [mailto:jboss-as7-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Max Rydahl
>>>> Andersen
>>>> Sent: 05 April 2012 10:22 AM
>>>> To: Carlo de Wolf
>>>> Cc: jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [jboss-as7-dev] Overriding Deployment Descriptors
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 5, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/04/2012 05:01 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>> And all this override would be via management API's, not
doable with any
>>>> deployment-scanner operations?
>>>>>> i.e. can I do something like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cd overridestuff
>>>>>> cp * to
>>>>>> /data/contents/xyz.war/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> now xyz.war has an "incomplete" override of xyz.war
which will be
>>>>>> "overlayed" on to deployment named xyz.war (independent
on wether it
>>>>>> comes from deployment scanner or management api)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> or is it all just via management api's that would need to be
executed on
>>>> every restart/change to the data/contents folder ?
>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>
>>>>> How about?
>>>>>
>>>>> standalone/deployments/xyz.war.part01/
>>>>> standalone/deployments/xyz.war.part02/
>>>>> standalone/deployments/xyz.war.part03/
>>>>>
>>>>> touch standalone/deployments/xyz.war.dodeploy
>>>> I like that but I thought these were ment to be put in a separate
location
>>>> than /deployments ? (if not then +1)
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>>>