In addition to the testing / migration points Dan makes, this actually
has a docs/QE impact.
Whoops, I meant docs/GSS impact. Sorry.
It often comes up that customers think the name
DefaultDS means something specific, and that they shouldn't change it.
Since we absolutely don't want them using the sample datasource for
production, I think calling it "sample" is a win all around. I think
customers would be much less comfortable using the "sample" datasource
in production than trying to use the "default" datasource in
production.
> I know this seems trivial, but trust me, it makes a huge difference
> to
> help bring new users on board. They are forced to deal with
> datasources before they can learn anything else.
>
>
> -Dan
> --
>
> Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in
> Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
>
>
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
>
http://mojavelinux.com
>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in
> Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
>
>
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
>
http://mojavelinux.com
>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
--
Misty Stanley-Jones, RHCE
Content Author, ECS Brisbane
IRC: misty_wrk (Freenode) / Ph: +61 7 3514 8105 / Internal: 88105
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
--
Misty Stanley-Jones, RHCE
Content Author, ECS Brisbane
IRC: misty_wrk (Freenode) / Ph: +61 7 3514 8105 / Internal: 88105