[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-701) PojoCache to revisit usage of get with gravitation
by Ben Wang (JIRA)
PojoCache to revisit usage of get with gravitation
--------------------------------------------------
Key: JBCACHE-701
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-701
Project: JBoss Cache
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: PojoCache
Reporter: Ben Wang
Assigned To: Ben Wang
Fix For: POJOCache
Currently we have in couple places to trigger data gravitation (for buddy replication) in PojoCache. But this is still prone to error (and may be inefficient as well) becuase of the possibility of recursive call. Is it possible that we do this from the user code instead? That is, before we go to PojoCache, can we do get(region, dataGravitation) to gravitate all data to this node first?
Let's check this with Brian.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
18 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-446) Support rulebase configuration via jsr94 registerRuleExecutionSet properties
by Juergen none (JIRA)
Support rulebase configuration via jsr94 registerRuleExecutionSet properties
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-446
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-446
Project: JBoss Rules
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: JSR94
Affects Versions: 3.0.4
Reporter: Juergen none
Assigned To: Mark Proctor
Priority: Minor
Is it possible to support rulebase configuration via jsr94 registerRuleExecutionSet properties?
Suggestion:
- new property in
org.drools.jsr94.rules.Constants.java:41:
//jh: added to support handing a rulebase config via jsr94
/** <code>RuleExecutionSet</code> rulebase config constant. */
public static final String RES_CONFIG = "javax.rules.admin.RuleExecutionSet.config";
- modification of method (probably secure against ClassCastException)
org.drools.jsr94.rules.admin.RuleExecutionSetImpl.java:118:RuleExecutionSetImpl(...):
//jh: support rulebase configuration via jsr94
final org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase ruleBase = new org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase((org.drools.RuleBaseConfiguration)properties.get(org.drools.jsr94.rules.Constants.RES_CONFIG), new Jsr94FactHandleFactory() );
/*
final org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase ruleBase = new org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase( new Jsr94FactHandleFactory() );
*/
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
18 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-501) DRL -> decision table (round trip)
by Scott Reed (JIRA)
DRL -> decision table (round trip)
----------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-501
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-501
Project: JBoss Rules
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Decision tables
Reporter: Scott Reed
Assigned To: Mark Proctor
It would be extremely useful to be able to convert existing rules to decision tables. The educational value alone would make it worth while, but it would speed up development as well since the DRL -> decision table mapping is not straight forward and cell merging and coloring is fairly tedious.
Users would probably want to be able to select the rules and functions to be mapped. If so, then the results of the mapping would have to be one or more decision table files and a new DRL file containing the rules and functions that were not converted.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
18 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-502) Add binding semantics for decision table authors
by Scott Reed (JIRA)
Add binding semantics for decision table authors
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-502
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-502
Project: JBoss Rules
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Decision tables
Reporter: Scott Reed
Assigned To: Mark Proctor
The expressive capability of decision tables for non-programmer authors is limited. Especially, the author has no way to tell the developer to use the value of a property from one column in the condition for another. I can think of two ways that binding semantics could be added:
Use the comment cells (i.e. "Age: Person's Age") - this is simple and expressive but would cause problems if an author wants to use the '<word>:' construct in a comment without intending it to be a binding.
Add a designated row above or below the comment row.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
18 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-451) Allow optional trailing comma "," for field constraint list
by Juergen none (JIRA)
Allow optional trailing comma "," for field constraint list
-----------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-451
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-451
Project: JBoss Rules
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Drl Parser/Builder
Affects Versions: 3.0.4
Reporter: Juergen none
Assigned To: Mark Proctor
Priority: Optional
With frequently re-arranging / adding / removing field constraints, I more than once forgot to add / remove trailing/separating commas in the field constraint list.
would it be possible to extend the drools drl syntax to allow an optional trailing comma?
e.g.
A(
a == 1,
b == 2, // optional trailing comma, should not yield the syntax error
)
A(
a == 1,
b == 2 // no (optional) trailing comma, like currently required, is also valid
)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
18 years, 3 months