[JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-7818) RMIAdaptor replacement based on JSR160
by Thomas Diesler (JIRA)
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-7818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Thomas Diesler commented on JBAS-7818:
--------------------------------------
The OSGi remote testsuite relies on the RMIAdaptor.
Recent changes made
<groupId>org.jboss.jbossas</groupId>
<artifactId>jboss-as-client</artifactId>
<version>6.0.0.20100216-M2</version>
unusable with jbossas/trunk.
Could you please provide documentation on the intended migration path?
* How should clients remotely connect to JMX in the future?
* When is the existing access method intended to go out of service?
I assume that access to the RMIAdaptor using the 6.0.0.20100216-M2 client libraries should continue to work for a while and that I am seeing a bug introduced by recent changes.
> RMIAdaptor replacement based on JSR160
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBAS-7818
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-7818
> Project: JBoss Application Server
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JMX
> Reporter: Scott M Stark
> Assignee: Scott Marlow
> Fix For: JBossAS-6.0.0.M3
>
>
> A replacement for the proprietary RMIAdaptor is needed that supports authentication, authorization and SSL.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-4383) Allow a different JSF implementation to be packaged in the WAR
by Stan Silvert (JIRA)
Allow a different JSF implementation to be packaged in the WAR
--------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBAS-4383
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4383
Project: JBoss Application Server
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: JavaServerFaces
Affects Versions: JBossAS-4.2.0.CR2, JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta2
Reporter: Stan Silvert
Assigned To: Stan Silvert
Fix For: JBossAS-4.2.0.GA, JBossAS-5.0.0.Beta3, JBossAS-5.0.0.GA
Prior to JEE5, most developers would bundle a JSF implementation such as MyFaces with the WAR. With AS 4.2 and 5.0, you should instead rely on the JSF implementation that ships with the container.
However, for these legacy applications that rely on a particular implementation, we can disable the built-in JSF implementation as long as you stick with the default classloader settings. To disable the built-in JSF, you will add this to your web.xml:
<context-param>
<param-name>org.jboss.jbossfaces.WAR_BUNDLES_JSF_IMPL</param-name>
<param-value>true</param-value>
</context-param>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
15 years, 7 months