[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2840) @Schedule EJB Timer not using timezone when calculating next timeout
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-2840:
-----------------------------------------------
Vaclav Tunka <vtunka(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1059914|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059914] from MODIFIED to ON_QA
> @Schedule EJB Timer not using timezone when calculating next timeout
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2840
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2840
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.CR1
> Reporter: Brad Maxwell
> Assignee: Brad Maxwell
> Fix For: 8.0.0.Final
>
>
> With a system running in Central Timezone, if it uses the annotation below specifying the timezone as Eastern timezone, with the hour set to the current hour.
> The timer will fire once, and it will calculate the next timeout to be in the next hour CST, where as it should take in consideration the timezone specified on @Schedule which is Eastern. If it did, then the timer should continue to fire every minute.
> {code}
> @Schedule(persistent = false, timezone = "America/New_York", dayOfMonth = "*", dayOfWeek = "*", month = "*", hour = "22", minute = "*", second = "0", year = "*")
> {code}
> 21:53:00,006 INFO [stdout] (EJB default - 1) ScheduleTest: nextTimeout:Wed Jan 29 22:00:00 CST 2014
> {code}
> import javax.ejb.Schedule;
> import javax.ejb.Singleton;
> import javax.ejb.Startup;
> @Startup
> @Singleton
> public class ScheduleTest {
> @Schedule(persistent = false, timezone = "America/New_York", dayOfMonth = "*", dayOfWeek = "*", month = "*", hour = "22", minute = "*", second = "0", year = "*")
> public void helloWorld(Timer time) {
> System.out.println("ScheduleTest: timer:" + time.getClass().getName() + " " + time.getNextTimeout() + " " + time.getInfo());
> }
> }
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2198) Remote Naming throws the same exception for different causes
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on WFLY-2198:
-----------------------------------------------
Vaclav Tunka <vtunka(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1053426|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1053426] from MODIFIED to ON_QA
> Remote Naming throws the same exception for different causes
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2198
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2198
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Naming
> Reporter: Brad Maxwell
> Assignee: Brad Maxwell
>
> A generic NamingException are thrown if all of the servers specified are unreachable as well as if the user/pass are invalid and a security exception is thrown up, they both are converted into a RuntimeException and a message listing the servers it was unable to call is reported.
> We should be throwing a different exception in the cases we know the cause, such as connection timeout or authentication exception.
> If all the the servers specified are not not running:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> javax.naming.NamingException: Failed to connect to any server. Servers tried: [remote://localhost:4447]
> at org.jboss.naming.remote.client.HaRemoteNamingStore.failOverSequence(HaRemoteNamingStore.java:213)
> If one of the servers is running, but the client's username/password are incorrect
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> javax.naming.NamingException: Failed to connect to any server. Servers tried: [remote://localhost:4447]
> at org.jboss.naming.remote.client.HaRemoteNamingStore.failOverSequence(HaRemoteNamingStore.java:213)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3040) Missing modules
by Tomaz Cerar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tomaz Cerar commented on WFLY-3040:
-----------------------------------
What is your issue exactly?
And please before you file JIRA with such vague description, try to discuss problem on forums / mailing lists first.
> Missing modules
> ---------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3040
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3040
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: OSGi
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Environment: Windows 64 bits
> Reporter: David Cabillic
> Assignee: Thomas Diesler
>
> I listed modules with links to missing ones :
> || module || missing module ||
> | org.infinispan.client.hotrod | com.google.protobuf |
> | org.jboss.as.aggregate | org.jboss.as.managed-beans |
> | org.jboss.genericjms | org.jboss.genericjms.provider |
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3040) Missing modules
by David Cabillic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
David Cabillic commented on WFLY-3040:
--------------------------------------
Sorry, perhaps OSGi is not the good component, it is a Wildfly's modules issue.
> Missing modules
> ---------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3040
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3040
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: OSGi
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Environment: Windows 64 bits
> Reporter: David Cabillic
> Assignee: Thomas Diesler
>
> I listed modules with links to missing ones :
> || module || missing module ||
> | org.infinispan.client.hotrod | com.google.protobuf |
> | org.jboss.as.aggregate | org.jboss.as.managed-beans |
> | org.jboss.genericjms | org.jboss.genericjms.provider |
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1800) OverlappingMergeTest testRegularMessageSending does not receive all expected mcast messages
by Richard Achmatowicz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Richard Achmatowicz closed JGRP-1800.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Done
The issue no longer appears in the test results. I'll reopen if it starts to appear again.
> OverlappingMergeTest testRegularMessageSending does not receive all expected mcast messages
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1800
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1800
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.2.13
> Environment: RHEL, Solairis
> Reporter: Richard Achmatowicz
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.2.13
>
>
> testRegularMessageSending is a kind of smoke test for the stack used in OverlappingMergeTest:
> - three channels a,b,c are created with a particular stack (see modifyConfigs)
> - each of a,b,c sends 5 multicast messages to the group, with message payloads "1", "2", "3", "4", "5"
> - the receiver in each channel collects up the multicasts received
> - the test checks that all 15 messages are received by each of the channels, and an assertion error is thrown is this is not the case
> This test is failing occasionally. An example of the error:
> {noformat}
> Error Message
> (C) num_mcasts=C: 1 C: 2 C: 3 C: 4 C: 5 A: 1 B: 1 A: 2 B: 2 B: 3 B: 4 A: 4 B: 5 A: 5 expected: 15)
> Stacktrace
> java.lang.AssertionError
> at org.jgroups.tests.OverlappingMergeTest.checkReceivedMessages(OverlappingMergeTest.java:476)
> at org.jgroups.tests.OverlappingMergeTest.testRegularMessageSending(OverlappingMergeTest.java:66)
> {noformat}
> This assertion error indicates that multicast #3 was not received from A by C.
> This is a very simple scenario and failures should not be occurring. I mention this error as there are other merge tests, namely:
> * testOverlappingMergeWithBC
> * testOverlappingMergeWithABC
> which are more complex, but when we look at their failures, they fail on an initial step similar to the one described above.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1800) OverlappingMergeTest testRegularMessageSending does not receive all expected mcast messages
by Richard Achmatowicz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Richard Achmatowicz commented on JGRP-1800:
-------------------------------------------
I have reviewed the platform test results incorporating this change:
- instances of the failure before the change (across all platforms): 18
- instances of this failure after the change (across all platforms): 0
So it appears that this was the root cause of the issue.
I'm going to close this issue.
> OverlappingMergeTest testRegularMessageSending does not receive all expected mcast messages
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1800
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1800
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.2.13
> Environment: RHEL, Solairis
> Reporter: Richard Achmatowicz
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.2.13
>
>
> testRegularMessageSending is a kind of smoke test for the stack used in OverlappingMergeTest:
> - three channels a,b,c are created with a particular stack (see modifyConfigs)
> - each of a,b,c sends 5 multicast messages to the group, with message payloads "1", "2", "3", "4", "5"
> - the receiver in each channel collects up the multicasts received
> - the test checks that all 15 messages are received by each of the channels, and an assertion error is thrown is this is not the case
> This test is failing occasionally. An example of the error:
> {noformat}
> Error Message
> (C) num_mcasts=C: 1 C: 2 C: 3 C: 4 C: 5 A: 1 B: 1 A: 2 B: 2 B: 3 B: 4 A: 4 B: 5 A: 5 expected: 15)
> Stacktrace
> java.lang.AssertionError
> at org.jgroups.tests.OverlappingMergeTest.checkReceivedMessages(OverlappingMergeTest.java:476)
> at org.jgroups.tests.OverlappingMergeTest.testRegularMessageSending(OverlappingMergeTest.java:66)
> {noformat}
> This assertion error indicates that multicast #3 was not received from A by C.
> This is a very simple scenario and failures should not be occurring. I mention this error as there are other merge tests, namely:
> * testOverlappingMergeWithBC
> * testOverlappingMergeWithABC
> which are more complex, but when we look at their failures, they fail on an initial step similar to the one described above.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-1795) OOBTest testRandomRegularAndOOBMulticasts fails to receive all messages
by Richard Achmatowicz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Richard Achmatowicz commented on JGRP-1795:
-------------------------------------------
I have reviewed the platform test results incorporating this change:
instances of the failure before the change (across all platforms): 10
instances of this failure after the change (across all platforms): 0
So it appears that this was the root cause of the issue.
I'm going to keep this open for another test run, just to confirm.
> OOBTest testRandomRegularAndOOBMulticasts fails to receive all messages
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-1795
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1795
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.2.13
> Environment: RHEL(3/24), WIN (1/6), Solaris (6/24) where (x/y) means x failures over y test executions.
> Reporter: Richard Achmatowicz
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 3.2.13
>
>
> This test does the following with two channels a and b:
> - adds a DISCARD layer to a to disccard 50% of down messages
> - sends 20 messages to the group, randomly using a and b as senders, and randomly choosing OOB or non-OOB
> - wait 10 seconds for 20 messages to be received by each of a and b
> - print out the messages received
> - remove the DISCARD layer from a
> - wait 2.5 seconds for further messages to arrive
> - assert that 20 messages have arrived for each channel a and b
> The test fails on the assertion, with results such as:
> {noformat}
> expected 20 elements, but got 19 (list=[1, 4, 3, 8, 6, 7, 10, 13, 15, 20, 2, 5, 9, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19]), missing=[0, 11]
> {noformat}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 7 months