[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6780) could not spécify version 3 for ldap connection
by cyril leclerc (JIRA)
cyril leclerc created WFLY-6780:
-----------------------------------
Summary: could not spécify version 3 for ldap connection
Key: WFLY-6780
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6780
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: cyril leclerc
Assignee: Jason Greene
HI,
in case of using LDAPExtLoginModule and ldap realm if in active directory there is more than 1000 groups it returns an error :
Caused by: javax.naming.SizeLimitExceededException: [LDAP: error code 4 - Sizelimit Exceeded]; remaining name 'CN=Users,DC=realad,DC=ad'
i can't change in AD the MAXPAGESIZE parameter and i can't specify the module to use version 3 of ldap how i can do ?
it is a big issue for me -)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6762) Wildfly cluster failover test not working as expected on windows OS, when network is disabled on a VM(Node) or by shutting down the VM (Node).
by Preeta Kuruvilla (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Preeta Kuruvilla reopened WFLY-6762:
------------------------------------
Hi Paul,
Reopening the issue after providing you the right jgroups-subsystem info.
Thanks,
Preeta
> Wildfly cluster failover test not working as expected on windows OS, when network is disabled on a VM(Node) or by shutting down the VM (Node).
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-6762
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6762
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Quality Risk
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: 8.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Preeta Kuruvilla
> Assignee: Paul Ferraro
> Priority: Blocker
>
> In your mail related to WFLY-6749 you have said the below :-
> **The default stack contains the following failure detection protocols:
> FD_SOCK
> FD_ALL
> These protocols are described here:
> http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection
> I suspect that your method of simulating a failure - by disabling the network of the host machine is not being detected by FD_SOCK. It will however, be detected by FD_ALL, but only after 1 minute. The heartbeat timeout used by FD_ALL can be manipulated via the timeout property.
> e.g.
> <protocol type="FD_ALL" ><property name="timeout">60000</property></protocol>
> **************************************************************************************************
> Thanks for the quick response on WFLY-6749.
> Based on your suggestion, I had a taken a look at the testing scenarios mentioned in "Table 29. Failure detection behavior" in the link that you provided- http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection. No where its mentioned that disabling a network on a node, is a valid testing scenario in Wildfly cluster.
> The Failover is working properly when the network on a node is disabled on a weblogic cluster for our application. However it doesn't work and it hampers the application functionality on Wildfly cluster when we try to disable the network on a node in Wildfly cluster.
> However as I said earlier, the failover on wildfly cluster works when we stop a node from admin console or give Ctrl + C to stop the services on a node.
> Would like to get a confirmation from you that disabling the network on a node is not the valid failover testing scenario for wildfly cluster.
> Also we tried to test the same failover scenario by Shutting down/power off a VM (node) in a wildfly cluster. It did not work for Windows Environment although it worked for linux environment.
> Note: we are using Windows 2012 environment. Here is a link I found: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31218710/unable-to-stop-wildfly-8-2-se...
> https://developer.jboss.org/thread/238135?tstart=0
> Thanks,
> Preeta
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6762) Wildfly cluster failover test not working as expected on windows OS, when network is disabled on a VM(Node) or by shutting down the VM (Node).
by Preeta Kuruvilla (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Preeta Kuruvilla commented on WFLY-6762:
----------------------------------------
Oops! sorry. I just missed to state that we had this jgroups configuration for cache replication too and wanted to be sure that it does not interfere with the jgroups dealings with the cluster failover and hence I mentioned it in my previous comment.
As for the domain.xml for wildfly cluster -the jgroups subsytems, is as under:-
<subsystem xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:jgroups:2.0" default-stack="udp">
<stack name="udp">
<transport type="UDP" socket-binding="jgroups-udp"/>
<protocol type="PING"/>
<protocol type="MERGE3"/>
<protocol type="FD_SOCK" socket-binding="jgroups-udp-fd"/>
<protocol type="FD_ALL"/>
<protocol type="VERIFY_SUSPECT"/>
<protocol type="pbcast.NAKACK2"/>
<protocol type="UNICAST3"/>
<protocol type="pbcast.STABLE"/>
<protocol type="pbcast.GMS"/>
<protocol type="UFC"/>
<protocol type="MFC"/>
<protocol type="FRAG2"/>
<protocol type="RSVP"/>
</stack>
<stack name="tcp">
<transport type="TCP" socket-binding="jgroups-tcp"/>
<protocol type="MPING" socket-binding="jgroups-mping"/>
<protocol type="MERGE2"/>
<protocol type="FD_SOCK" socket-binding="jgroups-tcp-fd"/>
<protocol type="FD"/>
<protocol type="VERIFY_SUSPECT"/>
<protocol type="pbcast.NAKACK2"/>
<protocol type="UNICAST3"/>
<protocol type="pbcast.STABLE"/>
<protocol type="pbcast.GMS"/>
<protocol type="MFC"/>
<protocol type="FRAG2"/>
<protocol type="RSVP"/>
</stack>
</subsystem>
Thanks,
Preeta
> Wildfly cluster failover test not working as expected on windows OS, when network is disabled on a VM(Node) or by shutting down the VM (Node).
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-6762
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6762
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Quality Risk
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: 8.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Preeta Kuruvilla
> Assignee: Paul Ferraro
> Priority: Blocker
>
> In your mail related to WFLY-6749 you have said the below :-
> **The default stack contains the following failure detection protocols:
> FD_SOCK
> FD_ALL
> These protocols are described here:
> http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection
> I suspect that your method of simulating a failure - by disabling the network of the host machine is not being detected by FD_SOCK. It will however, be detected by FD_ALL, but only after 1 minute. The heartbeat timeout used by FD_ALL can be manipulated via the timeout property.
> e.g.
> <protocol type="FD_ALL" ><property name="timeout">60000</property></protocol>
> **************************************************************************************************
> Thanks for the quick response on WFLY-6749.
> Based on your suggestion, I had a taken a look at the testing scenarios mentioned in "Table 29. Failure detection behavior" in the link that you provided- http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection. No where its mentioned that disabling a network on a node, is a valid testing scenario in Wildfly cluster.
> The Failover is working properly when the network on a node is disabled on a weblogic cluster for our application. However it doesn't work and it hampers the application functionality on Wildfly cluster when we try to disable the network on a node in Wildfly cluster.
> However as I said earlier, the failover on wildfly cluster works when we stop a node from admin console or give Ctrl + C to stop the services on a node.
> Would like to get a confirmation from you that disabling the network on a node is not the valid failover testing scenario for wildfly cluster.
> Also we tried to test the same failover scenario by Shutting down/power off a VM (node) in a wildfly cluster. It did not work for Windows Environment although it worked for linux environment.
> Note: we are using Windows 2012 environment. Here is a link I found: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31218710/unable-to-stop-wildfly-8-2-se...
> https://developer.jboss.org/thread/238135?tstart=0
> Thanks,
> Preeta
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6762) Wildfly cluster failover test not working as expected on windows OS, when network is disabled on a VM(Node) or by shutting down the VM (Node).
by Paul Ferraro (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Paul Ferraro closed WFLY-6762.
------------------------------
Resolution: Rejected
> Wildfly cluster failover test not working as expected on windows OS, when network is disabled on a VM(Node) or by shutting down the VM (Node).
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-6762
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6762
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Quality Risk
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: 8.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Preeta Kuruvilla
> Assignee: Paul Ferraro
> Priority: Blocker
>
> In your mail related to WFLY-6749 you have said the below :-
> **The default stack contains the following failure detection protocols:
> FD_SOCK
> FD_ALL
> These protocols are described here:
> http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection
> I suspect that your method of simulating a failure - by disabling the network of the host machine is not being detected by FD_SOCK. It will however, be detected by FD_ALL, but only after 1 minute. The heartbeat timeout used by FD_ALL can be manipulated via the timeout property.
> e.g.
> <protocol type="FD_ALL" ><property name="timeout">60000</property></protocol>
> **************************************************************************************************
> Thanks for the quick response on WFLY-6749.
> Based on your suggestion, I had a taken a look at the testing scenarios mentioned in "Table 29. Failure detection behavior" in the link that you provided- http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection. No where its mentioned that disabling a network on a node, is a valid testing scenario in Wildfly cluster.
> The Failover is working properly when the network on a node is disabled on a weblogic cluster for our application. However it doesn't work and it hampers the application functionality on Wildfly cluster when we try to disable the network on a node in Wildfly cluster.
> However as I said earlier, the failover on wildfly cluster works when we stop a node from admin console or give Ctrl + C to stop the services on a node.
> Would like to get a confirmation from you that disabling the network on a node is not the valid failover testing scenario for wildfly cluster.
> Also we tried to test the same failover scenario by Shutting down/power off a VM (node) in a wildfly cluster. It did not work for Windows Environment although it worked for linux environment.
> Note: we are using Windows 2012 environment. Here is a link I found: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31218710/unable-to-stop-wildfly-8-2-se...
> https://developer.jboss.org/thread/238135?tstart=0
> Thanks,
> Preeta
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6762) Wildfly cluster failover test not working as expected on windows OS, when network is disabled on a VM(Node) or by shutting down the VM (Node).
by Paul Ferraro (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Paul Ferraro commented on WFLY-6762:
------------------------------------
I see what's going on here. You use the term "Wildfly cluster" and then explain that you are using ehcache replication. This has nothing to do with WildFly. ehcache is a completely different project. The JGroups configuration you have posted has nothing to do with the JGroups subsystem in WildFly. I recommend starting here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ehcache-users
> Wildfly cluster failover test not working as expected on windows OS, when network is disabled on a VM(Node) or by shutting down the VM (Node).
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-6762
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6762
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Quality Risk
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: 8.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Preeta Kuruvilla
> Assignee: Paul Ferraro
> Priority: Blocker
>
> In your mail related to WFLY-6749 you have said the below :-
> **The default stack contains the following failure detection protocols:
> FD_SOCK
> FD_ALL
> These protocols are described here:
> http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection
> I suspect that your method of simulating a failure - by disabling the network of the host machine is not being detected by FD_SOCK. It will however, be detected by FD_ALL, but only after 1 minute. The heartbeat timeout used by FD_ALL can be manipulated via the timeout property.
> e.g.
> <protocol type="FD_ALL" ><property name="timeout">60000</property></protocol>
> **************************************************************************************************
> Thanks for the quick response on WFLY-6749.
> Based on your suggestion, I had a taken a look at the testing scenarios mentioned in "Table 29. Failure detection behavior" in the link that you provided- http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection. No where its mentioned that disabling a network on a node, is a valid testing scenario in Wildfly cluster.
> The Failover is working properly when the network on a node is disabled on a weblogic cluster for our application. However it doesn't work and it hampers the application functionality on Wildfly cluster when we try to disable the network on a node in Wildfly cluster.
> However as I said earlier, the failover on wildfly cluster works when we stop a node from admin console or give Ctrl + C to stop the services on a node.
> Would like to get a confirmation from you that disabling the network on a node is not the valid failover testing scenario for wildfly cluster.
> Also we tried to test the same failover scenario by Shutting down/power off a VM (node) in a wildfly cluster. It did not work for Windows Environment although it worked for linux environment.
> Note: we are using Windows 2012 environment. Here is a link I found: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31218710/unable-to-stop-wildfly-8-2-se...
> https://developer.jboss.org/thread/238135?tstart=0
> Thanks,
> Preeta
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-6762) Wildfly cluster failover test not working as expected on windows OS, when network is disabled on a VM(Node) or by shutting down the VM (Node).
by Preeta Kuruvilla (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Preeta Kuruvilla updated WFLY-6762:
-----------------------------------
Description:
In your mail related to WFLY-6749 you have said the below :-
**The default stack contains the following failure detection protocols:
FD_SOCK
FD_ALL
These protocols are described here:
http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection
I suspect that your method of simulating a failure - by disabling the network of the host machine is not being detected by FD_SOCK. It will however, be detected by FD_ALL, but only after 1 minute. The heartbeat timeout used by FD_ALL can be manipulated via the timeout property.
e.g.
<protocol type="FD_ALL" ><property name="timeout">60000</property></protocol>
**************************************************************************************************
Thanks for the quick response on WFLY-6749.
Based on your suggestion, I had a taken a look at the testing scenarios mentioned in "Table 29. Failure detection behavior" in the link that you provided- http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection. No where its mentioned that disabling a network on a node, is a valid testing scenario in Wildfly cluster.
The Failover is working properly when the network on a node is disabled on a weblogic cluster for our application. However it doesn't work and it hampers the application functionality on Wildfly cluster when we try to disable the network on a node in Wildfly cluster.
However as I said earlier, the failover on wildfly cluster works when we stop a node from admin console or give Ctrl + C to stop the services on a node.
Would like to get a confirmation from you that disabling the network on a node is not the valid failover testing scenario for wildfly cluster.
Also we tried to test the same failover scenario by Shutting down/power off a VM (node) in a wildfly cluster. It did not work for Windows Environment although it worked for linux environment.
Note: we are using Windows 2012 environment. Here is a link I found: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31218710/unable-to-stop-wildfly-8-2-se...
https://developer.jboss.org/thread/238135?tstart=0
Thanks,
Preeta
was:
In your mail related to WFLY-6749 you has said the below :-
**The default stack contains the following failure detection protocols:
FD_SOCK
FD_ALL
These protocols are described here:
http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection
I suspect that your method of simulating a failure - by disabling the network of the host machine is not being detected by FD_SOCK. It will however, be detected by FD_ALL, but only after 1 minute. The heartbeat timeout used by FD_ALL can be manipulated via the timeout property.
e.g.
<protocol type="FD_ALL" ><property name="timeout">60000</property></protocol>
**************************************************************************************************
Thanks for the quick response on WFLY-6749.
Based on your suggestion, I had a taken a look at the testing scenarios mentioned in "Table 29. Failure detection behavior" in the link that you provided- http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection. No where its mentioned that disabling a network on a node, is a valid testing scenario in Wildfly cluster.
The Failover is working properly when the network on a node is disabled on a weblogic cluster for our application. However it doesn't work and it hampers the application functionality on Wildfly cluster when we try to disable the network on a node in Wildfly cluster.
However as I said earlier, the failover on wildfly cluster works when we stop a node from admin console or give Ctrl + C to stop the services on a node.
Would like to get a confirmation from you that disabling the network on a node is not the valid failover testing scenario for wildfly cluster.
Also we tried to test the same failover scenario by Shutting down/power off a VM (node) in a wildfly cluster. It did not work for Windows Environment although it worked for linux environment.
Note: we are using Windows 2012 environment. Here is a link I found: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31218710/unable-to-stop-wildfly-8-2-se...
https://developer.jboss.org/thread/238135?tstart=0
Thanks,
Preeta
> Wildfly cluster failover test not working as expected on windows OS, when network is disabled on a VM(Node) or by shutting down the VM (Node).
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-6762
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6762
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Quality Risk
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: 8.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Preeta Kuruvilla
> Assignee: Paul Ferraro
> Priority: Blocker
>
> In your mail related to WFLY-6749 you have said the below :-
> **The default stack contains the following failure detection protocols:
> FD_SOCK
> FD_ALL
> These protocols are described here:
> http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection
> I suspect that your method of simulating a failure - by disabling the network of the host machine is not being detected by FD_SOCK. It will however, be detected by FD_ALL, but only after 1 minute. The heartbeat timeout used by FD_ALL can be manipulated via the timeout property.
> e.g.
> <protocol type="FD_ALL" ><property name="timeout">60000</property></protocol>
> **************************************************************************************************
> Thanks for the quick response on WFLY-6749.
> Based on your suggestion, I had a taken a look at the testing scenarios mentioned in "Table 29. Failure detection behavior" in the link that you provided- http://www.jgroups.org/manual/index.html#FailureDetection. No where its mentioned that disabling a network on a node, is a valid testing scenario in Wildfly cluster.
> The Failover is working properly when the network on a node is disabled on a weblogic cluster for our application. However it doesn't work and it hampers the application functionality on Wildfly cluster when we try to disable the network on a node in Wildfly cluster.
> However as I said earlier, the failover on wildfly cluster works when we stop a node from admin console or give Ctrl + C to stop the services on a node.
> Would like to get a confirmation from you that disabling the network on a node is not the valid failover testing scenario for wildfly cluster.
> Also we tried to test the same failover scenario by Shutting down/power off a VM (node) in a wildfly cluster. It did not work for Windows Environment although it worked for linux environment.
> Note: we are using Windows 2012 environment. Here is a link I found: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31218710/unable-to-stop-wildfly-8-2-se...
> https://developer.jboss.org/thread/238135?tstart=0
> Thanks,
> Preeta
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1379) service.bat points user to wrong directory
by Tomaz Cerar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Tomaz Cerar commented on WFCORE-1379:
-------------------------------------
Well, than this is different issue than one described here, this issue only talks about bug in documentation noting else.
please create separate issue for this.
> service.bat points user to wrong directory
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-1379
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1379
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Scripts
> Affects Versions: 2.0.10.Final
> Reporter: Nicklas Karlsson
> Assignee: Tomaz Cerar
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.2.0.CR1, 3.0.0.Alpha1
>
>
> Running service.bat from the docs/contrib/scripts/service dir tells user to run the script under bin/service*s* but the binary paths to the services expects bin/service, resulting in service install failure with file not found
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 4 months