September 2016 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-234) Inconsistent synchronization in ConfigurationFile

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-234: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha6) > Inconsistent synchronization in ConfigurationFile > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-234 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-234 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Alpha11 > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7 > > > ConfigurationFile synchronizes on itself in some places and not in others. This may cause problems, particularly with the history dir. > The one that comes to mind is successfulBoot is synchronized, but all the methods called by ConfigurationFilePersistenceResource are not. The latter is called with the controller lock held, but the former is not. So there's a possibility of two threads interacting with the files concurrently if an operation executes immediately after boot. > The deployment scanner schedules such an op, so it's possible. Currently the schedule is for 200 ms after deployment-scanner add runs during boot. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-296) Switch URI scheme from remoting:// http-remoting:// https-remoting:// to remote:// remote+http:// and remote+https://

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-296: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha6) > Switch URI scheme from remoting:// http-remoting:// https-remoting:// to remote:// remote+http:// and remote+https:// > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-296 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-296 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: CLI, Domain Management > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7 > > > From [~dmlloyd] > {quote} > When we have multi-layer protocol going on, the URI scheme we should use > is like this: > outer+middle+inner:// > {quote} > Switch URI schemes from remoting:// http-remoting:// https-remoting:// to remote:// remote+http:// and remote+https:// > The existing schemes will be needed for backwards compatibility but somehow deprecated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-610) Integrate Elytron for management security.

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-610: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha6) > Integrate Elytron for management security. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-610 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-610 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Domain Management, Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7 > > > This is a top level container task for the integration of Elytron for domain management security. > Do note however that the purpose of Elytron is a single unified security solution across the whole of the application server so many tasks here will be groundwork for the remainder of the integration. > At the moment the Elytron subsystem is being developed outside of wildfly-core, this will need to change in the future due to dependency issues (i.e. to write a subsystem you need to depend on core and core will need to include the subsystem (I think.)). However this will make it easier for now to ensure that the subsystem is 100% with no WildFly code accessing the subsystem - and also verify that we can create a distribtion with out the subsystem and still have a functional server. > Overall if someone came up with an alternative subsystem that provided the same capabilities it should be possible to drop it in. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-406) Resource description for platform mbean properties that throw UnsupportedOperationException should say nillable="true"

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-406: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha6) > Resource description for platform mbean properties that throw UnsupportedOperationException should say nillable="true" > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-406 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-406 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Environment: FreeBSD, OpenJDK 1.6 > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7 > > > Some platform mbean getters are documented to throw a UOE on some VMs. The read-resource handler will catch the UOE and leave the attribute undefined, but the description says it's not nillable. > Specifically, PlatformMBeanDescriptions.getThreadingResource()'s THREAD_CPU_TIME_ENABLED attribute, although there may well be others. > This leads to this unit test failure on jvms where the UOE is thrown: > failure message="thread-cpu-time-enabled is undefined" > type="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError">junit.fra mework.AssertionFailedError: thread-cpu-time-enabled is undefined > at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:50) > at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20) > at > org.jboss.as.platform.mbean.PlatformMBeanResourceUnitTestCase.validateResource(PlatformMBeanResourceUn > itTestCase.java:595) > at org.jboss.as.platform.mbean.PlatformMBeanResourceUnitTestCase.basicResourceTest(PlatformMBeanResourceUnitTestCase.java:563) > at > org.jboss.as.platform.mbean.PlatformMBeanResourceUnitTestCase.testThreadingMXBean(PlatformMBeanResourceUnitTestCase.java:340) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-710) Make ServerOperationResolver handle deployment-overlays similarly to deployments

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-710: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha6) > Make ServerOperationResolver handle deployment-overlays similarly to deployments > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-710 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-710 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Domain Management > Affects Versions: 2.0.0.Alpha2 > Reporter: Kabir Khan > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7 > > > Currently in domain mode a > {code} > /deployment-overlay=xxx:add(...) > {code} > results in a deployment overlay on ALL servers. > However for deployments > {code} > /deployment=xxx:add(...) > {code} > does not get pushed to the servers. This happens when it is associated with a server group: > {code} > /server-group=zzz/deployment=xxx:add(...) > {code} > Similarly > {code} > /deployment-overlay=xxx:add(...) > {code} > should not get pushed to the servers, until we have a > {code} > /server-group=zzz/deployment=yyy:add(...) > {code} > which picks out the servers we want to have the overlay -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-673) Elytron Integration with Core

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-673: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha6) > Elytron Integration with Core > ----------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-673 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-673 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7 > > > This is the top level tracking task for Elytron integration within core. The tasks for the changes actually being made will either be linked or added as sub-tasks. > In addition to this general issues that affect the Elytron integration are being labelled with 'affects_elytron' and can be queried using the following query: - > https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12323574 > The label is a general catch-all for issues that are of interest to us but are not automatically blockers for our progress. > The general criteria for the resolution of this issue will be: - > - Inclusion of the Elytron Subsystem in core > - All network entry points in core to be securable using Elytron > - All SSL artefacts to be obtainable from Elytron. > Note: The legacy modes will become better defined as we progress but whilst it must be possible to use Elytron it's use may still be optional to a certain degree. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1006) Upgrade to PicketBox 5

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1006: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha6) > Upgrade to PicketBox 5 > ---------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1006 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1006 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Components: Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Stefan Guilhen > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-887) "Deprecate" using an expression in model refs to interfaces

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-887: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha6) > "Deprecate" using an expression in model refs to interfaces > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-887 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-887 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7 > > > SocketBindingGroupResourceDefinition and OutboundSocketBindingResourceDefinition both have attributes that represent model refs to interface resources, but which also allow expressions. > Model references should not allow expressions. These were "grandfathered in" when the large scale expression support roll out happened for AS 7.2 / EAP 6.1. > There's no metadata facility to record that expression support is deprecated, but the add handler for these should log a WARN if they encounter an expression. Hopefully in EAP 8 we can then remove expression support. > We should look for other cases like this too, although those changes should be separate JIRAs. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-952) Use WildFly Common for null param checks

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-952: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha6) > Use WildFly Common for null param checks > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-952 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-952 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: David Lloyd > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7 > > > For each module, do the following: > * Locate any/all null param check methods in the log msg > * Replace them with calls to org.wildfly.common.Assert#checkNotNullParam or related method as needed > * Replace the old null param check method with a comment that reserves the ID and shows that it was previously used for that purpose -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-909) Allow tests to turn on boot-time enforcement of capability resolution in an --admin-only process

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-909: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha7 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha6) > Allow tests to turn on boot-time enforcement of capability resolution in an --admin-only process > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-909 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-909 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha7 > > > The OperationContext current will not throw error during boot of an --admin-only process if required capabilities cannot all be resolved, instead simply logging an ERROR. This is to allow the process to boot and give the user an opportunity to fix the problem. > Test suites often run admin-only processes though to test management of the model without needing to be concerned about runtime services. For these tests, failing on boot if required capabilities are not present may be desired. In particular, it's desirable for WF full's ParseAndMarshalModelsTestCase. So this task is to use a "jboss.unsupported.validate.boot.capabilities" system property to turn on capability resolution enforcement. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira September 2016