[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3134) When is operation add-alias run more times for same alias name then is displayed \" instead of only " in failure description.
by Jiri Ondrusek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Jiri Ondrusek commented on WFCORE-3134:
---------------------------------------
Correct JIRA for this isuue is https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3043
I'm closing this one.
> When is operation add-alias run more times for same alias name then is displayed \" instead of only " in failure description.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3134
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3134
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Beta30
> Reporter: Jiri Ondrusek
> Assignee: Jiri Ondrusek
> Labels: eap72
>
> When is operation add-alias run more times for same alias name then is displayed \" instead of only " in failure description.
> There is expected quotation without backslash in failure description.
> *How to reproduce*
> *create credential store*
> {code}
> /subsystem=elytron/credential-store=cs001:add(create=true, credential-reference={clear-text=pass123},location=cs001.jceks)
> {code}
> *Try to add-alias twice and for second run you get failure description.*
> {code}
> /subsystem=elytron/credential-store=cs001:add-alias(alias=alias001, secret-value="secret_value")
> /subsystem=elytron/credential-store=cs001:add-alias(alias=alias001, secret-value="secret_value")
> {
> "outcome" => "failed",
> "result" => undefined,
> "failure-description" => "WFLYELY00913: Credential alias \"alias001\" of credential type \"org.wildfly.security.credential.PasswordCredential\" already exists in the store",
> "rolled-back" => true
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3043) When is operation add-alias run more times for same alias name then is displayed \" instead of only " in failure description.
by Jiri Ondrusek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Jiri Ondrusek reassigned WFCORE-3043:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: Jiri Ondrusek (was: Darran Lofthouse)
> When is operation add-alias run more times for same alias name then is displayed \" instead of only " in failure description.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3043
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3043
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Hynek Švábek
> Assignee: Jiri Ondrusek
>
> When is operation add-alias run more times for same alias name then is displayed \" instead of only " in failure description.
> There is expected quotation without backslash in failure description.
> *How to reproduce*
> *create credential store*
> {code}
> /subsystem=elytron/credential-store=cs001:add(create=true, credential-reference={clear-text=pass123},location=cs001.jceks)
> {code}
> *Try to add-alias twice and for second run you get failure description.*
> {code}
> /subsystem=elytron/credential-store=cs001:add-alias(alias=alias001, secret-value="secret_value")
> /subsystem=elytron/credential-store=cs001:add-alias(alias=alias001, secret-value="secret_value")
> {
> "outcome" => "failed",
> "result" => undefined,
> "failure-description" => "WFLYELY00913: Credential alias \"alias001\" of credential type \"org.wildfly.security.credential.PasswordCredential\" already exists in the store",
> "rolled-back" => true
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1689) maven-checkstyle-plugin does not have a version specified, so the build is non-reproducible
by Geoffrey De Smet (JIRA)
Geoffrey De Smet created DROOLS-1689:
----------------------------------------
Summary: maven-checkstyle-plugin does not have a version specified, so the build is non-reproducible
Key: DROOLS-1689
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1689
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Task
Components: build
Reporter: Geoffrey De Smet
Assignee: Karel Suta
Priority: Minor
{code}
$ mvn versions:display-plugin-updates
...
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Building OptaPlanner multiproject parent 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO]
[INFO] --- versions-maven-plugin:2.1:display-plugin-updates (default-cli) @ optaplanner ---
[INFO] artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin: checking for updates from central
[INFO] artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin: checking for updates from jboss-public-repository-group
[INFO]
[INFO] All plugins with a version specified are using the latest versions.
[INFO]
[WARNING] The following plugins do not have their version specified:
[WARNING] maven-checkstyle-plugin ..................................... 2.17
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1687) NPE in JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects()
by Mario Fusco (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Mario Fusco updated DROOLS-1687:
--------------------------------
Sprint: 2017 Week 30-31
> NPE in JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects()
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1687
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1687
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Jiri Locker
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Attachments: DroolsReproducerTest.java
>
>
> Based on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45161751/get-broken-constrains-in-opt....
> {code}
> Exception executing consequence for rule "requiredCpuPowerTotal" in testpkg: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.drools.core.runtime.rule.impl.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.handleException(DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.java:39)
> ...
> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.drools.core.base.accumulators.JavaAccumulatorFunctionExecutor$JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects(JavaAccumulatorFunctionExecutor.java:208)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.FromNodeLeftTuple.getAccumulatedObjects(FromNodeLeftTuple.java:94)
> at org.drools.core.common.AgendaItem.getObjectsDeep(AgendaItem.java:79)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.RuleTerminalNodeLeftTuple.getObjectsDeep(RuleTerminalNodeLeftTuple.java:359)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1687) NPE in JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects()
by Geoffrey De Smet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Geoffrey De Smet edited comment on DROOLS-1687 at 8/2/17 4:20 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mario and I had a meeting, we decided to C) *fail fast with a helpful error message (including accumulate name and hopefully rule name etc)* and Mario will create a new jira linked here to have G) *the min/max functions also have reverseSupport if and only if a flag is true on the KieSession*.
Raw meeting notes:
{code}
A) return empty list // ge0ffrey: -1 (user doesn't know)
B) log warning; return empty list
C) Fail fast // ge0ffrey +1
throw UnsupportedOperationException "The justification failed
because the accumulate function (max) in rule (my hard constraint) on line 72 in foo.drl
does not have reverseSupport"
D) minWithReverseSupport, maxWithReverseSupport
con: users don't care and have to make a choice up front
E) min and max have reverseSupport always
con: performance loss? how much?
F) Can we do E) with a flag on the KieBase?
drools.setProperty("giveMinMaxReverseSupport" = true)
G) Can we do E) with a flag on the KieSession?
drools.setProperty("giveMinMaxReverseSupport" = true)
// OptaPlanner knows for each KieSession if it needs justification or not (= constraintMatchEnabled = true)
Proposal: C) in case they use a custom function without reverseSupport
G) so C) doesn't happen much
{code}
was (Author: ge0ffrey):
Mario and I had a meeting, we decided to *fail fast with a helpful error message (including accumulate name and hopefully rule name etc)* and Mario will create a new jira linked here to have *the min/max functions also have reverseSupport if and only if a flag is true on the KieSession*.
Raw meeting notes:
{code}
A) return empty list // ge0ffrey: -1 (user doesn't know)
B) log warning; return empty list
C) Fail fast // ge0ffrey +1
throw UnsupportedOperationException "The justification failed
because the accumulate function (max) in rule (my hard constraint) on line 72 in foo.drl
does not have reverseSupport"
D) minWithReverseSupport, maxWithReverseSupport
con: users don't care and have to make a choice up front
E) min and max have reverseSupport always
con: performance loss? how much?
F) Can we do E) with a flag on the KieBase?
drools.setProperty("giveMinMaxReverseSupport" = true)
G) Can we do E) with a flag on the KieSession?
drools.setProperty("giveMinMaxReverseSupport" = true)
// OptaPlanner knows for each KieSession if it needs justification or not (= constraintMatchEnabled = true)
Proposal: C) in case they use a custom function without reverseSupport
G) so C) doesn't happen much
{code}
> NPE in JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects()
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1687
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1687
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Jiri Locker
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Attachments: DroolsReproducerTest.java
>
>
> Based on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45161751/get-broken-constrains-in-opt....
> {code}
> Exception executing consequence for rule "requiredCpuPowerTotal" in testpkg: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.drools.core.runtime.rule.impl.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.handleException(DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.java:39)
> ...
> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.drools.core.base.accumulators.JavaAccumulatorFunctionExecutor$JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects(JavaAccumulatorFunctionExecutor.java:208)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.FromNodeLeftTuple.getAccumulatedObjects(FromNodeLeftTuple.java:94)
> at org.drools.core.common.AgendaItem.getObjectsDeep(AgendaItem.java:79)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.RuleTerminalNodeLeftTuple.getObjectsDeep(RuleTerminalNodeLeftTuple.java:359)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1687) NPE in JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects()
by Geoffrey De Smet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Geoffrey De Smet commented on DROOLS-1687:
------------------------------------------
Mario and I had a meeting, we decided to *fail fast with a helpful error message (including accumulate name and hopefully rule name etc)* and Mario will create a new jira linked here to have *the min/max functions also have reverseSupport if and only if a flag is true on the KieSession*.
Raw meeting notes:
{code}
A) return empty list // ge0ffrey: -1 (user doesn't know)
B) log warning; return empty list
C) Fail fast // ge0ffrey +1
throw UnsupportedOperationException "The justification failed
because the accumulate function (max) in rule (my hard constraint) on line 72 in foo.drl
does not have reverseSupport"
D) minWithReverseSupport, maxWithReverseSupport
con: users don't care and have to make a choice up front
E) min and max have reverseSupport always
con: performance loss? how much?
F) Can we do E) with a flag on the KieBase?
drools.setProperty("giveMinMaxReverseSupport" = true)
G) Can we do E) with a flag on the KieSession?
drools.setProperty("giveMinMaxReverseSupport" = true)
// OptaPlanner knows for each KieSession if it needs justification or not (= constraintMatchEnabled = true)
Proposal: C) in case they use a custom function without reverseSupport
G) so C) doesn't happen much
{code}
> NPE in JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects()
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1687
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1687
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Jiri Locker
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Attachments: DroolsReproducerTest.java
>
>
> Based on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45161751/get-broken-constrains-in-opt....
> {code}
> Exception executing consequence for rule "requiredCpuPowerTotal" in testpkg: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.drools.core.runtime.rule.impl.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.handleException(DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.java:39)
> ...
> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.drools.core.base.accumulators.JavaAccumulatorFunctionExecutor$JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects(JavaAccumulatorFunctionExecutor.java:208)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.FromNodeLeftTuple.getAccumulatedObjects(FromNodeLeftTuple.java:94)
> at org.drools.core.common.AgendaItem.getObjectsDeep(AgendaItem.java:79)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.RuleTerminalNodeLeftTuple.getObjectsDeep(RuleTerminalNodeLeftTuple.java:359)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3134) When is operation add-alias run more times for same alias name then is displayed \" instead of only " in failure description.
by Jiri Ondrusek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Jiri Ondrusek moved JBEAP-12483 to WFCORE-3134:
-----------------------------------------------
Project: WildFly Core (was: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform)
Key: WFCORE-3134 (was: JBEAP-12483)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: CDW with loose statuses v1)
Component/s: Security
(was: Security)
(was: User Experience)
Affects Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta30
(was: 7.1.0.DR19)
> When is operation add-alias run more times for same alias name then is displayed \" instead of only " in failure description.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3134
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3134
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Beta30
> Reporter: Jiri Ondrusek
> Assignee: Jiri Ondrusek
> Labels: eap72
>
> When is operation add-alias run more times for same alias name then is displayed \" instead of only " in failure description.
> There is expected quotation without backslash in failure description.
> *How to reproduce*
> *create credential store*
> {code}
> /subsystem=elytron/credential-store=cs001:add(create=true, credential-reference={clear-text=pass123},location=cs001.jceks)
> {code}
> *Try to add-alias twice and for second run you get failure description.*
> {code}
> /subsystem=elytron/credential-store=cs001:add-alias(alias=alias001, secret-value="secret_value")
> /subsystem=elytron/credential-store=cs001:add-alias(alias=alias001, secret-value="secret_value")
> {
> "outcome" => "failed",
> "result" => undefined,
> "failure-description" => "WFLYELY00913: Credential alias \"alias001\" of credential type \"org.wildfly.security.credential.PasswordCredential\" already exists in the store",
> "rolled-back" => true
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1687) NPE in JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects()
by Jiri Locker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Jiri Locker updated DROOLS-1687:
--------------------------------
Summary: NPE in JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects() (was: NPE in JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects)
> NPE in JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects()
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1687
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1687
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core engine
> Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Final
> Reporter: Jiri Locker
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Attachments: DroolsReproducerTest.java
>
>
> Based on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45161751/get-broken-constrains-in-opt....
> {code}
> Exception executing consequence for rule "requiredCpuPowerTotal" in testpkg: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.drools.core.runtime.rule.impl.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.handleException(DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.java:39)
> ...
> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.drools.core.base.accumulators.JavaAccumulatorFunctionExecutor$JavaAccumulatorFunctionContext.getAccumulatedObjects(JavaAccumulatorFunctionExecutor.java:208)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.FromNodeLeftTuple.getAccumulatedObjects(FromNodeLeftTuple.java:94)
> at org.drools.core.common.AgendaItem.getObjectsDeep(AgendaItem.java:79)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.RuleTerminalNodeLeftTuple.getObjectsDeep(RuleTerminalNodeLeftTuple.java:359)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 4 months