[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12613) Exclude IBM J9 JVM from Byteman-based test cases
by Brian Stansberry (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Brian Stansberry commented on WFLY-12613:
-----------------------------------------
The only CI WildFly does with IBM JDK is JDK 8, so the fact it's not executed on IBM JDK11 doesn't bother me. So I think it's fine.
> Exclude IBM J9 JVM from Byteman-based test cases
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-12613
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12613
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test Suite
> Affects Versions: 18.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Richard Achmatowicz
> Assignee: Richard Achmatowicz
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 18.0.0.Final
>
>
> The test case org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.byteman.LastNodeToLeaveRemoteEJBTestCase uses Byteman to check a condition for validating whether the test passes or fails. The component arquillian-extension-byteman is used to allow the use of Byteman annotations within the Arquillian test case.
> There is a problem with running Byteman-based test cases against the IBM J9 Java runtime:
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.byteman.LastNodeToLeaveRemoteEJBTestCase Time elapsed: 1.202 s <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not install byteman agent
> at org.jboss.arquillian.extension.byteman.impl.client.AgentInstaller.install(AgentInstaller.java:98)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:55)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:507)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:90)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createSuiteContext(TestContextHandler.java:69)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:55)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:507)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:95)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:133)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:105)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.EventTestRunnerAdaptor.beforeSuite(EventTestRunnerAdaptor.java:71)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.AdaptorManager.initializeAdaptor(AdaptorManager.java:23)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.AdaptorManagerWithNotifier.initializeAdaptor(AdaptorManagerWithNotifier.java:19)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.run(Arquillian.java:109)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:383)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:344)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:125)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:417)
> Caused by: com.sun.tools.attach.AgentInitializationException: ATTACH_ERR AgentInitializationException102
> at ibm.tools.attach.J9VirtualMachine.loadAgent(J9VirtualMachine.java:66)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.extension.byteman.impl.client.AgentInstaller.install(AgentInstaller.java:91)
> ... 28 more
> {noformat}
>
> {noformat}
> [nrla@localhost wildfly-git-repo]$ java -version
> java version "1.8.0"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxa6480sr2-20151023_01(SR2))
> IBM J9 VM (build 2.8, JRE 1.8.0 Linux amd64-64 Compressed References 20151019_272764 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
> J9VM - R28_Java8_SR2_20151019_2144_B272764
> JIT - tr.r14.java_20151006_102517.04
> GC - R28_Java8_SR2_20151019_2144_B272764_CMPRSS
> J9CL - 20151019_272764)
> JCL - 20151022_01 based on Oracle jdk8u65-b17
> {noformat}
> Until this JVM bug can be fixed, we need to exclude executions of this test against the IBM J9 JVM.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12613) Exclude IBM J9 JVM from Byteman-based test cases
by Richard Achmatowicz (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Richard Achmatowicz edited comment on WFLY-12613 at 10/1/19 2:09 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a bit of a problem here in getting the exclusion to work with the combination of two conditions above.
Firstly, AFAICT, maven profiles don't permit using multiple activation conditions, so I can't easily set up a profile to exclude the test.
Secondly, I can't use the condition:
{noformat}
Assume.assumeFalse(System.getProperty("java.version").startsWith("1.8") && System.getProperty("java.vendor").startsWith("IBM"));
{noformat}
within the test itself, as the agent gets loaded (and the exception gets raised) before the test executes. I can confirm this.
Thirdly, Arquillian does not support the use of Assume in a @BeforeClass or @AfterClass method, which would be where I would want to call it. In other words, the issue https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7741 still holds ( I tried it ...)
Please let me know if I am missing an obvious way to get around this.
What I can do is require that the test not execute against any IBM JVM, by setting up a profile to exclude that particular execution (ts.surefire.clustering.all-ejb-byteman). This would not affect the OpenJ9 test executions as they have a different Java vendor.
[~brian.stansberry] [~luck3y] WDYT?
was (Author: rachmato):
There is a bit of a problem here in getting the exclusion to work with the combination of two conditions above.
Firstly, AFAICT, maven profiles don't permit using multiple activation conditions, so I can't easily set up a profile to exclude the test.
Secondly, I can't use the condition:
{noformat}
Assume.assumeFalse(System.getProperty("java.version").startsWith("1.8") && System.getProperty("java.vendor").startsWith("IBM"));
{noformat}
within the test itself, as the agent gets loaded (and the exception gets raised) before the test executes. I can confirm this.
Thirdly, Arquillian does not support the use of Assume in a @BeforeClass or @AfterClass method, which would be where I would want to call it. In other words, the issue https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7741 still holds ( I tried it ...)
Please let me know if I am missing an obvious way to get around this.
What I can do is require that the test not execute against any IBM JVM, by setting up a profile to exclude that particular execution (ts.surefire.clustering.all-ejb-byteman). This would not affect the OpenJ9 test executions as they have a different Java vendor.
> Exclude IBM J9 JVM from Byteman-based test cases
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-12613
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12613
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test Suite
> Affects Versions: 18.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Richard Achmatowicz
> Assignee: Richard Achmatowicz
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 18.0.0.Final
>
>
> The test case org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.byteman.LastNodeToLeaveRemoteEJBTestCase uses Byteman to check a condition for validating whether the test passes or fails. The component arquillian-extension-byteman is used to allow the use of Byteman annotations within the Arquillian test case.
> There is a problem with running Byteman-based test cases against the IBM J9 Java runtime:
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.byteman.LastNodeToLeaveRemoteEJBTestCase Time elapsed: 1.202 s <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not install byteman agent
> at org.jboss.arquillian.extension.byteman.impl.client.AgentInstaller.install(AgentInstaller.java:98)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:55)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:507)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:90)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createSuiteContext(TestContextHandler.java:69)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:55)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:507)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:95)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:133)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:105)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.EventTestRunnerAdaptor.beforeSuite(EventTestRunnerAdaptor.java:71)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.AdaptorManager.initializeAdaptor(AdaptorManager.java:23)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.AdaptorManagerWithNotifier.initializeAdaptor(AdaptorManagerWithNotifier.java:19)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.run(Arquillian.java:109)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:383)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:344)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:125)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:417)
> Caused by: com.sun.tools.attach.AgentInitializationException: ATTACH_ERR AgentInitializationException102
> at ibm.tools.attach.J9VirtualMachine.loadAgent(J9VirtualMachine.java:66)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.extension.byteman.impl.client.AgentInstaller.install(AgentInstaller.java:91)
> ... 28 more
> {noformat}
>
> {noformat}
> [nrla@localhost wildfly-git-repo]$ java -version
> java version "1.8.0"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxa6480sr2-20151023_01(SR2))
> IBM J9 VM (build 2.8, JRE 1.8.0 Linux amd64-64 Compressed References 20151019_272764 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
> J9VM - R28_Java8_SR2_20151019_2144_B272764
> JIT - tr.r14.java_20151006_102517.04
> GC - R28_Java8_SR2_20151019_2144_B272764_CMPRSS
> J9CL - 20151019_272764)
> JCL - 20151022_01 based on Oracle jdk8u65-b17
> {noformat}
> Until this JVM bug can be fixed, we need to exclude executions of this test against the IBM J9 JVM.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years
[JBoss JIRA] (WFWIP-221) jps can't see server process in Openshift
by Jean Francois Denise (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Jean Francois Denise resolved WFWIP-221.
----------------------------------------
Resolution: Done
> jps can't see server process in Openshift
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFWIP-221
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-221
> Project: WildFly WIP
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: OpenShift
> Reporter: Jan Blizňák
> Assignee: Jean Francois Denise
> Priority: Critical
>
> This is somewhat curious issue.
> When pod of app image is deployed (server is started) and switch to terminal in Openshift GUI, doing `jps -l` does nothing although I can see in logs that server is up and I can find java process in /proc/*/cmdline (image has no `ps` utility).
> This happens only in Openshift environment and it is a regression to what was working with latest published CD image.
> Funnily, when I try to run the image in docker and start the server by /opt/eap/bin/openshift-launch.sh, then jps can see the java process.
> {code:java}
> # this works fine
> docker run -it docker-registry.upshift.redhat.com/kwills/eap-cd-openshift-rhel8:18.0-EAP... sh
> sh-4.4$ /opt/eap/bin/openshift-launch.sh &
> sh-4.4$ jps -l
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-12613) Exclude IBM J9 JVM from Byteman-based test cases
by Richard Achmatowicz (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Richard Achmatowicz commented on WFLY-12613:
--------------------------------------------
There is a bit of a problem here in getting the exclusion to work with the combination of two conditions above.
Firstly, AFAICT, maven profiles don't permit using multiple activation conditions, so I can't easily set up a profile to exclude the test.
Secondly, I can't use the condition:
{noformat}
Assume.assumeFalse(System.getProperty("java.version").startsWith("1.8") && System.getProperty("java.vendor").startsWith("IBM"));
{noformat}
within the test itself, as the agent gets loaded (and the exception gets raised) before the test executes. I can confirm this.
Thirdly, Arquillian does not support the use of Assume in a @BeforeClass or @AfterClass method, which would be where I would want to call it. In other words, the issue https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7741 still holds ( I tried it ...)
Please let me know if I am missing an obvious way to get around this.
What I can do is require that the test not execute against any IBM JVM, by setting up a profile to exclude that particular execution (ts.surefire.clustering.all-ejb-byteman). This would not affect the OpenJ9 test executions as they have a different Java vendor.
> Exclude IBM J9 JVM from Byteman-based test cases
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-12613
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-12613
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test Suite
> Affects Versions: 18.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Richard Achmatowicz
> Assignee: Richard Achmatowicz
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 18.0.0.Final
>
>
> The test case org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.byteman.LastNodeToLeaveRemoteEJBTestCase uses Byteman to check a condition for validating whether the test passes or fails. The component arquillian-extension-byteman is used to allow the use of Byteman annotations within the Arquillian test case.
> There is a problem with running Byteman-based test cases against the IBM J9 Java runtime:
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] org.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb.remote.byteman.LastNodeToLeaveRemoteEJBTestCase Time elapsed: 1.202 s <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not install byteman agent
> at org.jboss.arquillian.extension.byteman.impl.client.AgentInstaller.install(AgentInstaller.java:98)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:55)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:507)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:90)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createSuiteContext(TestContextHandler.java:69)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:55)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:507)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:86)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:95)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:133)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:105)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.EventTestRunnerAdaptor.beforeSuite(EventTestRunnerAdaptor.java:71)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.AdaptorManager.initializeAdaptor(AdaptorManager.java:23)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.AdaptorManagerWithNotifier.initializeAdaptor(AdaptorManagerWithNotifier.java:19)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.run(Arquillian.java:109)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:383)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:344)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:125)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:417)
> Caused by: com.sun.tools.attach.AgentInitializationException: ATTACH_ERR AgentInitializationException102
> at ibm.tools.attach.J9VirtualMachine.loadAgent(J9VirtualMachine.java:66)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.extension.byteman.impl.client.AgentInstaller.install(AgentInstaller.java:91)
> ... 28 more
> {noformat}
>
> {noformat}
> [nrla@localhost wildfly-git-repo]$ java -version
> java version "1.8.0"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxa6480sr2-20151023_01(SR2))
> IBM J9 VM (build 2.8, JRE 1.8.0 Linux amd64-64 Compressed References 20151019_272764 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
> J9VM - R28_Java8_SR2_20151019_2144_B272764
> JIT - tr.r14.java_20151006_102517.04
> GC - R28_Java8_SR2_20151019_2144_B272764_CMPRSS
> J9CL - 20151019_272764)
> JCL - 20151022_01 based on Oracle jdk8u65-b17
> {noformat}
> Until this JVM bug can be fixed, we need to exclude executions of this test against the IBM J9 JVM.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years
[JBoss JIRA] (WFWIP-202) Runtime changes to disableHTTPRoute are not reflected in Route object
by Martin Choma (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Martin Choma closed WFWIP-202.
------------------------------
I can confirm issue is addressed by jboss-eap-7-tech-preview-eap-operator:jb-eap-7.3-operator-rhel8-containers-candidate-66988-20191001135536.
However there is followup issue https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-223
> Runtime changes to disableHTTPRoute are not reflected in Route object
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFWIP-202
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-202
> Project: WildFly WIP
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: OpenShift
> Reporter: Martin Choma
> Assignee: Jeff Mesnil
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: operator
>
> Any changes (adding, removing or updating) made to disableHTTPRoute attribute after WildFlyServer CR was created are not reflected in underlying Route object.
> Reproducer:
> # create CR
> {code}
> apiVersion: wildfly.org/v1alpha1
> kind: WildFlyServer
> metadata:
> generation: 1
> name: eap-cd
> namespace: default
> spec:
> applicationImage: >-
> brew-pulp-docker01.web.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com:8888/jboss-eap-7-tech-preview/eap-cd-openshift-rhel8:17.0-4
> size: 1
> disableHTTPRoute: false
> {code}
> # Edit CR with disableHTTPRoute: true. I would expect Route object will be deleted.
> {code}
> apiVersion: wildfly.org/v1alpha1
> kind: WildFlyServer
> metadata:
> generation: 1
> name: eap-cd
> namespace: default
> spec:
> applicationImage: >-
> brew-pulp-docker01.web.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com:8888/jboss-eap-7-tech-preview/eap-cd-openshift-rhel8:17.0-4
> size: 1
> disableHTTPRoute: true
> {code}
> # Route object eap-cd is not disabled/deleted
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years
[JBoss JIRA] (WFWIP-223) disableHTTPRoute = true in runtime does not clean CR.status.hosts
by Martin Choma (Jira)
Martin Choma created WFWIP-223:
----------------------------------
Summary: disableHTTPRoute = true in runtime does not clean CR.status.hosts
Key: WFWIP-223
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFWIP-223
Project: WildFly WIP
Issue Type: Bug
Components: OpenShift
Reporter: Martin Choma
Assignee: Jeff Mesnil
Reproducer:
# create CR
{code}
apiVersion: wildfly.org/v1alpha1
kind: WildFlyServer
metadata:
generation: 1
name: eap-cd
namespace: default
spec:
applicationImage: >-
brew-pulp-docker01.web.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com:8888/jboss-eap-7-tech-preview/eap-cd-openshift-rhel8:17.0-4
size: 1
disableHTTPRoute: false
{code}
# Edit CR with disableHTTPRoute: true. I would expect Route object will be deleted.
{code}
apiVersion: wildfly.org/v1alpha1
kind: WildFlyServer
metadata:
generation: 1
name: eap-cd
namespace: default
spec:
applicationImage: >-
brew-pulp-docker01.web.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com:8888/jboss-eap-7-tech-preview/eap-cd-openshift-rhel8:17.0-4
size: 1
disableHTTPRoute: true
{code}
# Route object eap-cd is not deleted but status.hosts is still filled
{code:yaml}
apiVersion: wildfly.org/v1alpha1
kind: WildFlyServer
metadata:
creationTimestamp: '2019-10-01T17:20:34Z'
generation: 2
name: eap-cd
namespace: mchoma
resourceVersion: '629943'
selfLink: /apis/wildfly.org/v1alpha1/namespaces/mchoma/wildflyservers/eap-cd
uid: c7535f3f-e46f-11e9-b4ad-02e6008f3048
spec:
applicationImage: >-
image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/eapcd-suite-builds/eap-cd-openshift-rhel8:17.0-4
disableHTTPRoute: false
env: []
envFrom: []
replicas: 1
status:
hosts:
- >-
eap-cd-route-mchoma.apps.eap-qe-cluster105.eap-qe-cluster105.fw.rhcloud.com
pods:
- name: eap-cd-0
podIP: 10.131.0.246
state: ACTIVE
replicas: 1
scalingdownPods: 0
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years