[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3077) Enhance data type restrictions UX - Decision Table/properties
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton commented on DROOLS-3077:
-------------------------------------
[~manstis] I updated the demo above, based on discussion/decisions - only changes were:
* If the user select a data type that already has constraints they can add Input constraints two ways:
- inline in the input field as an expression.
- (CHANGE) also allow the user to employ the (+) Add icon to launch the dialog to add input constraints.
* If the user adds input constraints to a type that already has input constraints - the new constraints will over-write the existing ones (only for Input constraints, not data types.)
Didn't ask [~tirelli] whether we need to replicate all of this in the property panel; it's still an Open Issue.
> Enhance data type restrictions UX - Decision Table/properties
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3077
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3077
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: DataType selection ('Properties Panel' and 'in-grid').png, Screen Shot 2018-08-10 at 10.23.36 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-08-24 at 8.38.37 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-09-28 at 2.44.59 PM.png, date-time.png, date.png, enumration-widget.png, pop-overc.png, pop-overcSpecs.png, read-mode.png, select.png, time.png
>
>
> *Background*
> Persona: Business analyst or Rules practitioner
> Use Cases:
> * From the DMN canvas view - as a user I want to define data type restrictions (one-off instances) from a decision table .
> * From the Data Types dialog - as a user I want the ability to define constraints for the following types: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HLYwi5JrCEU6IxWRge7RCKANLiHCL0d2E...
> Functional considerations/ pre conditions:
> * Consider interaction in light of Property panel and consistency.
> * Underscore the notion of one-off constraints.
> Verification conditions:
> * Scrum team and PO review.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3077) Enhance data type restrictions UX - Decision Table/properties
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton edited comment on DROOLS-3077 at 3/4/19 5:14 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
[~manstis] I updated the demo above, based on discussion/decisions - only changes were:
* If the user select a data type that already has constraints they can add Input constraints two ways:
A. inline in the input field as an expression.
B. (CHANGE) also allow the user to employ the (+) Add icon to launch the dialog to add input constraints.
* If the user adds input constraints to a type that already has input constraints - the new constraints will over-write the existing ones (only for Input constraints, not data types.)
Didn't ask [~tirelli] whether we need to replicate all of this in the property panel; it's still an Open Issue.
was (Author: uxdlc):
[~manstis] I updated the demo above, based on discussion/decisions - only changes were:
* If the user select a data type that already has constraints they can add Input constraints two ways:
- inline in the input field as an expression.
- (CHANGE) also allow the user to employ the (+) Add icon to launch the dialog to add input constraints.
* If the user adds input constraints to a type that already has input constraints - the new constraints will over-write the existing ones (only for Input constraints, not data types.)
Didn't ask [~tirelli] whether we need to replicate all of this in the property panel; it's still an Open Issue.
> Enhance data type restrictions UX - Decision Table/properties
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3077
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3077
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: DataType selection ('Properties Panel' and 'in-grid').png, Screen Shot 2018-08-10 at 10.23.36 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-08-24 at 8.38.37 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-09-28 at 2.44.59 PM.png, date-time.png, date.png, enumration-widget.png, pop-overc.png, pop-overcSpecs.png, read-mode.png, select.png, time.png
>
>
> *Background*
> Persona: Business analyst or Rules practitioner
> Use Cases:
> * From the DMN canvas view - as a user I want to define data type restrictions (one-off instances) from a decision table .
> * From the Data Types dialog - as a user I want the ability to define constraints for the following types: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HLYwi5JrCEU6IxWRge7RCKANLiHCL0d2E...
> Functional considerations/ pre conditions:
> * Consider interaction in light of Property panel and consistency.
> * Underscore the notion of one-off constraints.
> Verification conditions:
> * Scrum team and PO review.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11806) socket-binding/jgroups-tcp client mappings do not map to jgroups.external_addr properly
by G. Richard Bellamy (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
G. Richard Bellamy updated WFLY-11806:
--------------------------------------
Description:
socket-binding/jgroups-tcp client mappings do not map to the system property {{jgroups.external_addr}} correctly, and therefore jgroups ALWAYS advertises the address bound to the {{private}} interface.
When setting the client mappings for the {{jgroups-tcp}} socket binding, wildfly should ensure that the pingdata for various discovery protocols announces the destination address set there, presumably by setting the {{jgroups.external_addr}} value.
was:
socket-binding/jgroups-tcp client mappings do not map to jgroups.external_addr properly, and therefore jgroups ALWAYS advertises the address bound to the {{private}} interface.
When setting the client mappings for the {{jgroups-tcp}} socket binding, wildfly should ensure that the pingdata for various discovery protocols announces the destination address set there, presumably by setting the {{jgroups.external_addr}} value.
> socket-binding/jgroups-tcp client mappings do not map to jgroups.external_addr properly
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11806
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11806
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: 15.0.1.Final
> Reporter: G. Richard Bellamy
> Assignee: Paul Ferraro
> Priority: Major
> Labels: JGroups
>
> socket-binding/jgroups-tcp client mappings do not map to the system property {{jgroups.external_addr}} correctly, and therefore jgroups ALWAYS advertises the address bound to the {{private}} interface.
> When setting the client mappings for the {{jgroups-tcp}} socket binding, wildfly should ensure that the pingdata for various discovery protocols announces the destination address set there, presumably by setting the {{jgroups.external_addr}} value.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3659) DMN: UX for documentation reports
by Roger Martínez (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Roger Martínez commented on DROOLS-3659:
----------------------------------------
Yep sure [~uxdlc] [~tirelli], we can achieve consistency between editors np. I don't know who will implement that, but please let him/her know that me or [~tdolphine] can help on moving this stuff to some shared module.
Thx
> DMN: UX for documentation reports
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3659
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: DROOLS-3659-documentation.mp4
>
>
> User stories:
> * As a user I want to generate a PDF or HTML report of the DMN model, with documentation, so that I can hand it off to external team and/or business that needs information about the diagrams and the logic of the decisions being automated. The report can be printed out and used by business teams not involved with the modeling itself, to learn about content of the .dmn file.
> * As a user I need a means through the UI to input additional documentation, links and attachments to nodes.
> Notes:
> - Docs to help with docs formatting.
> - Might be able to leverage Case View docs widget.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11806) socket-binding/jgroups-tcp client mappings do not map to jgroups.external_addr properly
by G. Richard Bellamy (Jira)
G. Richard Bellamy created WFLY-11806:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: socket-binding/jgroups-tcp client mappings do not map to jgroups.external_addr properly
Key: WFLY-11806
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11806
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Clustering
Affects Versions: 15.0.1.Final
Reporter: G. Richard Bellamy
Assignee: Paul Ferraro
socket-binding/jgroups-tcp client mappings do not map to jgroups.external_addr properly, and therefore jgroups ALWAYS advertises the address bound to the {{private}} interface.
When setting the client mappings for the {{jgroups-tcp}} socket binding, wildfly should ensure that the pingdata for various discovery protocols announces the destination address set there, presumably by setting the {{jgroups.external_addr}} value.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3659) DMN: UX for documentation reports
by Edson Tirelli (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Edson Tirelli commented on DROOLS-3659:
---------------------------------------
Yes, team, please make sure the support for this feature is absolutely consistent between BPMN and DMN.
> DMN: UX for documentation reports
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3659
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: DROOLS-3659-documentation.mp4
>
>
> User stories:
> * As a user I want to generate a PDF or HTML report of the DMN model, with documentation, so that I can hand it off to external team and/or business that needs information about the diagrams and the logic of the decisions being automated. The report can be printed out and used by business teams not involved with the modeling itself, to learn about content of the .dmn file.
> * As a user I need a means through the UI to input additional documentation, links and attachments to nodes.
> Notes:
> - Docs to help with docs formatting.
> - Might be able to leverage Case View docs widget.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3659) DMN: UX for documentation reports
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton commented on DROOLS-3659:
-------------------------------------
Thanks [~stetson.robinson]! Question for [~tdolphine]and [~roger600] - is there an opportunity to align the Documentation template for both DMN & BPMN, so that they can have a consistent structure/presentation?
> DMN: UX for documentation reports
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3659
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: DROOLS-3659-documentation.mp4
>
>
> User stories:
> * As a user I want to generate a PDF or HTML report of the DMN model, with documentation, so that I can hand it off to external team and/or business that needs information about the diagrams and the logic of the decisions being automated. The report can be printed out and used by business teams not involved with the modeling itself, to learn about content of the .dmn file.
> * As a user I need a means through the UI to input additional documentation, links and attachments to nodes.
> Notes:
> - Docs to help with docs formatting.
> - Might be able to leverage Case View docs widget.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3659) DMN: UX for documentation reports
by Stetson Robinson (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Stetson Robinson edited comment on DROOLS-3659 at 3/4/19 11:23 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
[~tdolphine], [~tirelli], [~uxdlc], So what's the next step from [Tiago's suggestion above|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?focusedCommentId=137009... Do we work with him and the BPMN guys to get our UI and report consistent or to tweak the html report template to meet both DMN and BPMN needs?
Here again is my proposed [example DMN model report|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xZBnRQfaTpFmMjU11Wzc2HhBqJCOVK...]. What do we need to do to make this a reality for our DMN modeler, using the existing BPMN html template? Can we coordinate our DMN and BPMN reporting strategies or do they need to be separate.
I understand if these decisions can't be made until development on the DMN reporting actually begins, but I'd like to know what and when the next steps are, so we're all on the same page.
was (Author: stetson.robinson):
[~tdolphine], [~tirelli], [~uxdlc], So what's the next step from [Tiago's suggestion above|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?focusedCommentId=137009... Do we work with him and the BPMN guys to get our UI and report consistent or to tweak the html report template to meet both DMN and BPMN needs?
Here again is my proposed [example DMN model report|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xZBnRQfaTpFmMjU11Wzc2HhBqJCOVK...]. What do we need to do to make this a reality for our DMN modeler, using the existing BPMN template? Can we coordinate our DMN and BPMN reporting strategies or do they need to be separate.
I understand if these decisions can't be made until development on the DMN reporting actually begins, but I'd like to know what and when the next steps are, so we're all on the same page.
> DMN: UX for documentation reports
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3659
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: DROOLS-3659-documentation.mp4
>
>
> User stories:
> * As a user I want to generate a PDF or HTML report of the DMN model, with documentation, so that I can hand it off to external team and/or business that needs information about the diagrams and the logic of the decisions being automated. The report can be printed out and used by business teams not involved with the modeling itself, to learn about content of the .dmn file.
> * As a user I need a means through the UI to input additional documentation, links and attachments to nodes.
> Notes:
> - Docs to help with docs formatting.
> - Might be able to leverage Case View docs widget.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3659) DMN: UX for documentation reports
by Stetson Robinson (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Stetson Robinson commented on DROOLS-3659:
------------------------------------------
[~tdolphine], [~tirelli], [~uxdlc], So what's the next step from [Tiago's suggestion above|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?focusedCommentId=137009... Do we work with him and the BPMN guys to get our UI and report consistent or to tweak the html report template to meet both DMN and BPMN needs?
Here again is my proposed [example DMN model report|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xZBnRQfaTpFmMjU11Wzc2HhBqJCOVK...]. What do we need to do to make this a reality for our DMN modeler, using the existing BPMN template? Can we coordinate our DMN and BPMN reporting strategies or do they need to be separate.
I understand if these decisions can't be made until development on the DMN reporting actually begins, but I'd like to know what and when the next steps are, so we're all on the same page.
> DMN: UX for documentation reports
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3659
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: DROOLS-3659-documentation.mp4
>
>
> User stories:
> * As a user I want to generate a PDF or HTML report of the DMN model, with documentation, so that I can hand it off to external team and/or business that needs information about the diagrams and the logic of the decisions being automated. The report can be printed out and used by business teams not involved with the modeling itself, to learn about content of the .dmn file.
> * As a user I need a means through the UI to input additional documentation, links and attachments to nodes.
> Notes:
> - Docs to help with docs formatting.
> - Might be able to leverage Case View docs widget.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 9 months