[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-543) Provide an operation to request service status report after server has been started
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-543:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.CR1
(was: 8.0.0.Beta1)
> Provide an operation to request service status report after server has been started
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-543
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-543
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Heiko Braun
> Labels: console_prio
> Fix For: 8.0.0.CR1
>
>
> For proper healthcare it would beneficial if I could verify the server status after it has been started. I.e. to catch these, which currently only appear in the server log:
> [Server:server-three] 17:48:26,636 INFO [org.jboss.as.server] (MSC service thread 1-2) Service status report
> [Server:server-three] New missing/unsatisfied dependencies:
> [Server:server-three] service jboss.binding.http2 (missing)
> [Server:server-three]
> [Server:server-three] 17:48:26,636 ERROR [org.jboss.as] (MSC service thread 1-4) JBoss AS 7.0.0.Beta4-SNAPSHOT "(TBD)" started (with errors) in 3893ms - Started 101 of 149 services (1 services failed or missing dependencies, 47 services are passive or on-demand)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-1309) CLI: creating a server on a domain slave followed by setting a system property fails when done in batch mode
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-1309:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.CR1
(was: 8.0.0.Beta1)
> CLI: creating a server on a domain slave followed by setting a system property fails when done in batch mode
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-1309
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1309
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Alpha1
> Environment: wildfly build from a git clone on 2013-05-02
> Reporter: Tom Fonteyne
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 8.0.0.CR1
>
> Attachments: host-domain-controller.xml, host-slave.xml
>
>
> Setup two boxes:
> - on one, run domain mode (full-ha) -> domain controller
> - on the other, configure host.xml to point to the DC, and run the host controller
> Now in CLI:
> # add the group:
> /server-group=slaves:add(profile=full-ha,socket-binding-group=full-ha-sockets)
> # create server and set a prop
> batch
> /host=slave1/server-config=i1:add(group=slaves,auto-start=false)
> /host=slave1/server-config=i1/system-property=env:add(value=dev)
> run-batch
> results in:
> JBAS010839: Operation failed or was rolled back on all servers.
> Debugging (on EAP 6.0.1) showed the real reason:
> activeStep.response = (org.jboss.dmr.ModelNode) {
> "outcome" => "failed",
> "failure-description" => "JBAS010850: No handler for operation
> composite at address [
> (\"host\" => \"slave1\"),
> (\"server\" => \"i1\")
> ]",
> "rolled-back" => true
> }
> More debugging led to :
> org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext
> seems to be where the rollback is set. When debugging, I found that the constructor always sets
> ModelController.OperationTransactionControl transactionControl
> but at line 332 (eap 6.0.1) / line 372 (wildfly), the end of doCompleteStep() :
> // Allow any containing TransactionControl to vote
> final AtomicReference<ResultAction> ref = new AtomicReference<ResultAction>(transactionControl == null ? ResultAction.KEEP : ResultAction.ROLLBACK);
> and ref becomes a rollback.
> I "walked" pretty much of all the code going on in between. The bit where the config is getting persisted is successful.
> But I'm afraid I'm out of my depth as there is *a lot* going on to execute such a composite command :)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-943) XML schema; use of elementFormDefault='unqualified'; cannot validate some documents
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-943:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.CR1
(was: 8.0.0.Beta1)
> XML schema; use of elementFormDefault='unqualified'; cannot validate some documents
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-943
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-943
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Alpha3
> Reporter: Elias Ross
> Fix For: 8.0.0.CR1
>
> Attachments: jboss-deployment-structure.xml
>
>
> When attempting to write a (seemingly) valid jboss-deployment-structure.xml using the schema in ./docs, my document fails to validate.
> This is because of the settings used in the XSD. Have these XSDs been used to validate actual documents? By setting unqualified to 'qualified' then the documents will probably validate.
> $ git grep elementFormDefault..unqualified
> jboss-deployment-dependencies-1_0.xsd: elementFormDefault="unqualified"
> jboss-deployment-structure-1_0.xsd: elementFormDefault="unqualified"
> jboss-deployment-structure-1_1.xsd: elementFormDefault="unqualified"
> jboss-deployment-structure-1_2.xsd: elementFormDefault="unqualified"
> jboss-ejb-client_1_0.xsd: elementFormDefault="unqualified"
> jboss-ejb-client_1_1.xsd: elementFormDefault="unqualified"
> jboss-ejb-client_1_2.xsd: elementFormDefault="unqualified"
> jboss-jpa_1_0.xsd: elementFormDefault="unqualified"
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-1428) Extra resource root added to WARs
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-1428:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.CR1
(was: 8.0.0.Beta1)
> Extra resource root added to WARs
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-1428
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1428
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Web (JBoss Web), Web (Undertow)
> Reporter: David Lloyd
> Assignee: Remy Maucherat
> Fix For: 8.0.0.CR1
>
>
> When the class path for WAR deployments is being assembled, it appears that the WAR's root is being added as a resource root. This seems to be counter to spec; by default this should not be done. Now that we have the ability to iterate class loader resources, this causes unusual things to be listed.
> Some users may desire this non-standard behavior though. So, we should have a way (preferably simpler than {{jboss-deployment-structure.xml}}) to enable it; however in this case, the following paths *must* be excluded:
> * {{WEB-INF/lib}}
> * {{WEB-INF/classes}}
> * Any additional configured library or class directories
> * Any other nested, mounted JAR files
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-1388) Cannot load module alias defined for root deployment
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-1388:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.CR1
(was: 8.0.0.Beta1)
> Cannot load module alias defined for root deployment
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-1388
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1388
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Thomas Diesler
> Assignee: Thomas Diesler
> Fix For: 8.0.0.CR1
>
>
> A module defined like this cannot get loaded by its module-alias
> {code}
> <jboss-deployment-structure xmlns="urn:jboss:deployment-structure:1.2">
> <deployment>
> <resources>
> <resource-root path="wrapped-resource.jar" use-physical-code-source="true"/>
> </resources>
> <dependencies>
> <module name="javax.api"/>
> <module name="javax.jms.api"/>
> <module name="org.apache.camel.core"/>
> <module name="org.springframework.beans"/>
> <module name="org.springframework.context"/>
> <module name="org.springframework.core"/>
> <module name="org.springframework.jms"/>
> <module name="org.springframework.transaction"/>
> <module name="org.slf4j"/>
> </dependencies>
> <module-alias name="org.apache.camel.component.jms"/>
> </deployment>
> </jboss-deployment-structure>
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-1315) Evaluate making operation "composite" EntryType.PUBLIC
by Jason Greene (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Jason Greene updated WFLY-1315:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.CR1
(was: 8.0.0.Beta1)
> Evaluate making operation "composite" EntryType.PUBLIC
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-1315
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1315
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 8.0.0.CR1
>
>
> When the composite operation handler is registered, it's marked as EntryType.PRIVATE. This operation really isn't private; any reasonable management client will need to invoke it.
> Changing it may have some implications though; we need to evaluate those. The biggest is the operation metadata cannot be complete, because the step parameter elements cannot be fully described.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 3 months