[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-396) Look into whether READ_ONLY but not RUNTIME_ONLY domain server ops should be visible to users
by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Stuart Douglas updated WFCORE-396:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0.CR1
(was: 1.0.0.Beta1)
> Look into whether READ_ONLY but not RUNTIME_ONLY domain server ops should be visible to users
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-396
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-396
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 1.0.0.CR1
>
>
> Ops registered on a domain server without the RUNTIME_ONLY flag are hidden from users (e.g. in read-operation-names results etc) in order to not delude users into thinking they can do something like :write-attribute directly on a server (instead of modifying host or domain config elements.)
> But shouldn't a READ_ONLY flag be sufficient as well? An op that only reads config should be valid.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
9 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-395) Improve reporting during deployment hang
by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Stuart Douglas updated WFCORE-395:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0.CR1
(was: 1.0.0.Beta1)
> Improve reporting during deployment hang
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-395
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-395
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Domain Management
> Environment: http://java.net/jira/browse/EJB_SPEC-60
> java version "1.7.0_09"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.3.3) (7u9-2.3.3-0ubuntu1~12.10.1)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode)
> Ubuntu 12.10
> Reporter: Carlo de Wolf
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 1.0.0.CR1
>
> Attachments: deployment-hang-20130205.txt, server.log
>
>
> Management Thread waits indefinitely for, what seems to be, a finished operation.
> {noformat}
> "management-handler-thread - 2" prio=10 tid=0x00007fa1380d0000 nid=0x7683 in Object.wait() [0x00007fa136deb000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
> at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
> - waiting on <0x00000000e04ae778> (a org.jboss.as.controller.ContainerStateMonitor)
> at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ContainerStateMonitor.awaitContainerStateChangeReport(ContainerStateMonitor.java:158)
> - locked <0x00000000e04ae778> (a org.jboss.as.controller.ContainerStateMonitor)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.awaitContainerStateChangeReport(ModelControllerImpl.java:464)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.OperationContextImpl.awaitModelControllerContainerMonitor(OperationContextImpl.java:148)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.doCompleteStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:299)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.completeStepInternal(AbstractOperationContext.java:229)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.executeOperation(AbstractOperationContext.java:224)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.internalExecute(ModelControllerImpl.java:142)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.ModelControllerImpl.execute(ModelControllerImpl.java:112)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler.doExecute(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:139)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.ModelControllerClientOperationHandler$ExecuteRequestHandler$1.execute(ModelControllerClientOperationHandler.java:108)
> at org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.AbstractMessageHandler$2$1.doExecute(AbstractMessageHandler.java:296)
> at org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.AbstractMessageHandler$AsyncTaskRunner.run(AbstractMessageHandler.java:518)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:122)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
9 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-431) CLI should WARN about usage deprecated api
by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Stuart Douglas updated WFCORE-431:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0.CR1
(was: 1.0.0.Beta1)
> CLI should WARN about usage deprecated api
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-431
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-431
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: CLI
> Reporter: Tomaz Cerar
> Assignee: Alexey Loubyansky
> Fix For: 1.0.0.CR1
>
>
> We added support for deprecating resources/attributes/operations/parameters some time ago.
> I would be a good thing that we would warn users if they are using deprecated API.
> Every resource/attribute/operation/param that is deprecated has extra element "deprecated" in metadata
> With sub elements
> - "since", which tells in what version it was deprecated
> - "reason", text description why it is deprecated.
> Reason in most cases also tells what is new replacement.
> This should be only displayed in case of interactive shell usage.
> Unless there is also some special CLI log file, it could be part of that even for non-interactive usage
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
9 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-429) Incremental redeployment (single file update) over management API
by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Stuart Douglas updated WFCORE-429:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0.CR1
(was: 1.0.0.Beta1)
> Incremental redeployment (single file update) over management API
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-429
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-429
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: CLI, Domain Management
> Reporter: Ondrej Zizka
> Labels: deploy, deployment, incremental, redeployment
> Fix For: 1.0.0.CR1
>
>
> (Based on JBDS use case - see EAP6-1)
> See also https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-934058 for notes
> By incremental redeployment, we mean the situation when something is deployed, and after changes (in IDE e.g.), only that single file (.jsp, .xml, .class) would be re-deployed to the server, *over management API* - which is, you'd give it a stream and a path where it belongs in the deployment, and the operation would accept that file and put it to the right place in VFS, clear caches etc.
> Use cases:
> Big .war's, mainly on remote
> Cloud deployments
> Also, you loose sessions etc.
> "JSP recompile on file update" - mgmt API operation - added in WildFly 8?
> Not expected to work in domain mode.
> Stuart said that session persistence is implemented in WFly 8, but not the incremental redeployment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
9 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-424) .jar's on "current runtime classpath"
by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Stuart Douglas updated WFCORE-424:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0.CR1
(was: 1.0.0.Beta1)
> .jar's on "current runtime classpath"
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-424
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-424
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: CLI, Modules
> Reporter: Ondrej Zizka
> Assignee: David Lloyd
> Fix For: 1.0.0.CR1
>
>
> (Based on JBDS use case - see EAP6-1)
> In certain scenarios, JBDS needs to know the classpath. (Compilation of non-maven project, against a remote server, ...(?) )
> The classpath would be:
> * for the deployment after deployed
> * for a generic deployment if it was deployed right now - what would WildFly use?
> * for the deployment before deployed - sounds a bit advanced but technically possible
> We (David, Stuart, Jason, Max, Ondra) have discussed this on EAP F2F 2014.
> The output was that we don't need exact classpath / list of jars which would probably end up being almost all modules; rather we need the direct deps. As someone said - "just to get rid of the red lines in the IDE".
> The non-maven compilation use case is that the user has a server in a directory, and the jars to build against should all be in there. So the IDE should be able to ask WildFly for a list of .jar's to build the application against, and just use that instead of forcing the user to gather them manually.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
9 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-403) Evaluate making operation "composite" EntryType.PUBLIC
by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Stuart Douglas updated WFCORE-403:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0.CR1
(was: 1.0.0.Beta1)
> Evaluate making operation "composite" EntryType.PUBLIC
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-403
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-403
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 1.0.0.CR1
>
>
> When the composite operation handler is registered, it's marked as EntryType.PRIVATE. This operation really isn't private; any reasonable management client will need to invoke it.
> Changing it may have some implications though; we need to evaluate those. The biggest is the operation metadata cannot be complete, because the step parameter elements cannot be fully described.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
9 years, 3 months