December 2016 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-363) ManagementResourceRegistration.getOverrideModel never returns null

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-363: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha15 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha14) > ManagementResourceRegistration.getOverrideModel never returns null > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-363 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-363 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha15 > > > ManagementResourceRegistration.getOverrideModel ends up returning the wildcard registration if there is no override registration. This isn't correct. > The fix isn't trivial because fixing it results in nasty failures in the smoke tests. From looking at the uses of this method (which all involve a null check) I assume there are some bugs in the code that calls this method that get exposed once it does what it should. > This bug is the cause of the initial failure of my WFLY-2880 fix. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1802) Integrate OpenSSL Provider registration with Elytron

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1802: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha15 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha14) > Integrate OpenSSL Provider registration with Elytron > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1802 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1802 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Stuart Douglas > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha15 > > > We need to remove the following block from SecurityRealmResourceDefinition: - > {code} > static { > //register the Openssl Provider, if possible > //not really sure if this is the best place for it > try { > OpenSSLProvider.register(); > DomainManagementLogger.ROOT_LOGGER.registeredOpenSSLProvider(); > } catch (Throwable t){ > DomainManagementLogger.ROOT_LOGGER.debugf(t, "Failed to register OpenSSL provider"); > } > } > {code} > Registration will then be possible within the Elytron subsystem configuration. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1598) Conversion of Elytron SecurityIdentity to Subject for communication with older hosts.

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1598: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha15 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha14) > Conversion of Elytron SecurityIdentity to Subject for communication with older hosts. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1598 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1598 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management, Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha15 > > > In the domain hierarchy clients trust the server they communicate with so this server currently sends a serialized representation of the Subject containing information about the user initiating the request. > For Elytron we will use the new identity propagation features however for older slaves we will need to convert to a Subject representation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1438) Elytron integration with logging subsystem

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1438: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha15 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha14) > Elytron integration with logging subsystem > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1438 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1438 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Logging > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha15 > > > This is primarily an investigation task to start with, Logging can use syslog, Syslog access can be protected with TLS, Elytron is providing unified SSL configuration - do we need to bring these together. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1533) Integrate Management Access Control permission assignment with Elytron

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1533: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha15 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha14) > Integrate Management Access Control permission assignment with Elytron > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1533 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1533 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Domain Management, Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Labels: affects_elytron > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha15 > > > A big portion of management role based access control is taking the assigned roles and then mapping these to the permissions for that role. > Elytron provides a new PermissionMapper interface that takes a SecurityIdentity and the roles mapped for that identity and returns a PermissionVerifier which can be as simple as a wrapper around a PermissionCollection. > This will also be a good opportunity to start to move the role mapping out of the core management model to Elytron. > After that Elytron allows for custom PermissionMapper implementations to be provided and associated with the domain using capabilities and requirements so we arrive at a point where provided the permission checks performed by management are generic enough custom PermissionMapper / PermissionVerifier implementations can be added that may or may not be role based. > _Note: As with everything we are doing old and new need to be supported in parallel for a while although this may be achieved by providing default Elytron implementations that are wrappers around the old._ -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1351) FilePermission for XNIO and Marshalling modules are required for Remoting to run with security manager

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1351: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha15 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha14) > FilePermission for XNIO and Marshalling modules are required for Remoting to run with security manager > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1351 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1351 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Remoting, Security > Reporter: Ondrej Kotek > Assignee: David Lloyd > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha15 > > Attachments: 1-no-createEndpoint-permission.stacktrace, 2-no-createXnioWorker-permission.stacktrace, 3-no-addConnectionProvider-permission.stacktrace, 4-no-accessDeclaredMembers-permission.stractrace, 5-no-suppressAccessChecks-permission.stracktrace > > > # Running _NestedRemoteContextTestCase_ (from WildFly _testsuite/integration/basic_) with security manager, like > {noformat} > ./integration-tests.sh -Dts.basic -Dts.noSmoke -Dtest=NestedRemoteContextTestCase -Dsecurity.manager > {noformat} > results in exception: > {noformat} > java.io.IOException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: XNIO001001: No XNIO provider found > {noformat} > To make it work, permissions like following need to be added to _permissions.xml_ of _ejb.ear_: > {noformat} > new FilePermission("/home/okotek/git/wildfly/dist/target/wildfly-10.0.0.CR5-SNAPSHOT/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/xnio/nio/main/*", "read"), > new FilePermission("/home/okotek/git/wildfly/dist/target/wildfly-10.0.0.CR5-SNAPSHOT/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/marshalling/river/main/*", "read"), > new RemotingPermission("createEndpoint"), > new RuntimePermission("createXnioWorker"), > new RemotingPermission("addConnectionProvider"), > new RuntimePermission("modifyThread"), > new RuntimePermission("accessDeclaredMembers"), > new ReflectPermission("suppressAccessChecks") > {noformat} > which is very confusing. > Why do I need add seemingly unrelated permissions, like _FilePermission_ for XNIO and marshalling or _RuntimePermission_ for createXnioWorker? Such behavior should be fixed or properly documented. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1954) Wrap CLIENT_CERT behaviour of legacy realms with Elytron components.

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1954: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha15 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha14) > Wrap CLIENT_CERT behaviour of legacy realms with Elytron components. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1954 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1954 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management, Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha15 > > > An re-enable the following test: - > * org.jboss.as.test.integration.domain.HTTPSManagementInterfaceTestCase -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1944) Convert domain-management tests to reference Elytron SecurityRealm and remove old CallbackHandler code.

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1944: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha15 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha14) > Convert domain-management tests to reference Elytron SecurityRealm and remove old CallbackHandler code. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1944 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1944 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management, Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha15 > > > The important pieces of code within the legacy security realms are being wrapped using Elytron components, items like the legacy CallbackHandlers can be removed but existing tests need porting to call Elytron APIs. > The legacy tests do need to be retained as they offer a good level of regression testing for the legacy realms. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1891) Split WildFly Elytron into two modules with a public / private split.

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1891: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha15 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha14) > Split WildFly Elytron into two modules with a public / private split. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1891 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1891 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Security > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha15 > > > The Elytron jar will be contained within a private module, possibly 'elytron-private' then a module 'elytron' will depend on this and make the public packages visible. > The following packages have been identified as being private: - > org.wildfly.security._private > org.wildfly.security.asn1 > org.wildfly.security.auth.realm > org.wildfly.security.auth.realm.* > org.wildfly.security.authz.jacc > org.wildfly.security.credential.store.impl > org.wildfly.security.security.digest > org.wildfly.security.http.impl > org.wildfly.security.security.keystore > org.wildfly.security.mechanism.oauth2 > org.wildfly.security.mechanism.scram > org.wildfly.security.password.impl > org.wildfly.security.password.util > org.wildfly.security.pem > org.wildfly.security.sasl > org.wildfly.security.sasl.* (Except util) > org.wildfly.security.util > org.wildfly.security.util_private > org.wildfly.security.x500 > org.wildfly.security.x500.cert -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1897) Follow up WFCORE-296 once migrated to Remoting 5

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1897: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Alpha15 (was: 3.0.0.Alpha14) > Follow up WFCORE-296 once migrated to Remoting 5 > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1897 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1897 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Remoting > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 3.0.0.Alpha15 > > > WFCORE-296 adds support for the schemes remote:// remote_http:// and remote+https:// - once we switch to centralised Endpoints we need to ensure this new set is still supported along with the previous set. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira December 2016