[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-1025) NPE removing a rule that contains a subnetwork
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on DROOLS-1025:
-------------------------------------------------
Ryan Zhang <rzhang(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1298579|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298579] from MODIFIED to ON_QA
> NPE removing a rule that contains a subnetwork
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-1025
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1025
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Mario Fusco
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
>
> Removing a rule containing a subnetwork causes the following NPE:
> {code}
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.drools.core.phreak.AddRemoveRule.deletePeerLeftTuple(AddRemoveRule.java:777)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.AddRemoveRule.followPeer(AddRemoveRule.java:749)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.AddRemoveRule.processLeftTuples(AddRemoveRule.java:713)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.AddRemoveRule.flushStagedTuples(AddRemoveRule.java:281)
> at org.drools.core.phreak.AddRemoveRule.removeRule(AddRemoveRule.java:153)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.ReteooBuilder.removeTerminalNode(ReteooBuilder.java:173)
> at org.drools.core.reteoo.ReteooBuilder.removeRule(ReteooBuilder.java:163)
> at org.drools.core.impl.KnowledgeBaseImpl.removeRule(KnowledgeBaseImpl.java:1635)
> at org.drools.core.impl.KnowledgeBaseImpl.removeRule(KnowledgeBaseImpl.java:1626)
> at org.drools.core.impl.KnowledgeBaseImpl.internalRemoveRule(KnowledgeBaseImpl.java:1610)
> at org.drools.core.impl.KnowledgeBaseImpl.removeRule(KnowledgeBaseImpl.java:1581)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years
[JBoss JIRA] (JBJCA-1318) list driven ExceptionSorter, StaleConnectionChecker
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on JBJCA-1318:
------------------------------------------------
Chao Wang <chaowan(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1320720|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320720] from POST to MODIFIED
> list driven ExceptionSorter, StaleConnectionChecker
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBJCA-1318
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-1318
> Project: IronJacamar
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: JDBC
> Reporter: Johnathon Lee
> Assignee: Johnathon Lee
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: WildFly/IronJacamar 1.3.4.Final, 1.0.37.Final, 1.2.8.Final
>
>
> Configuration defined ExceptionSorter, StaleConnectionChecker.
> Using an externally (from the implementation) defined "," separated list.
> Defined via '<config-property name=prop_name >value1,value2,value3</>' in the standalone/domain configuration files.
> ie:
> set via <config-property name="FatalExceptions">10099,10100,10101</>
> set via <config-property name="StaleExceptions">10099,10100,10101</>
> Documentation updated to reflect suggested error codes for vendor based upon the current implementations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years
[JBoss JIRA] (ELY-178) Domain to domain identity propagation
by Farah Juma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ]
Farah Juma reassigned ELY-178:
------------------------------
Assignee: Farah Juma (was: Darran Lofthouse)
> Domain to domain identity propagation
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: ELY-178
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ELY-178
> Project: WildFly Elytron
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Realms
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Assignee: Farah Juma
> Fix For: 1.1.0.CR1
>
>
> At the lowest level a users identity is associated with a single SecurityRealm, two accounts that authenticated against different realms will never be considered equal.
> However on top of this we have the security domains, a security domain amongst other things is an aggregation of realms. Incoming server connections and also applications can be associated with a security domain. However we still have the following two scenarios of a call to complete the consideration for: -
> Connection -> Deployment
> Deployment -> Deployment
> In the first case the connection may be associated with a security domain with a large set of realms, however the deployment may be associated with a smaller set of realms. In the case that the realm is in both of these domains we need the identity to be able to automatically propagate.
> Same for deployment to deployment calls, if there is a common realm the identity should propagate.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
10 years