[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3393) Please review scenario error cell text for legibility/accessibility.
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton updated DROOLS-3393:
--------------------------------
Attachment: Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at 12.05.50 PM.png
> Please review scenario error cell text for legibility/accessibility.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3393
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3393
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Klara Kufova
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at 11.59.32 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at 12.05.50 PM.png, Screenshot from 2018-11-30 17-11-43.png
>
>
> [~kkufova] [~bdellasc]
> I noticed that the error text is a little "fuzzy" looking, the edges aren't very sharp and I was concerned that it might not be legible. I asked Danielle about the specs for it and it's the same size just bolded.
> I did an online accessibility text using the following tool, with our current hex values: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/. It failed for level 3 compliance, but I'm not sure we need to shoot for that or not? I tried the darker PatternFly red color "#8b0000" and it passed at all levels, even at smaller sizes.
> I'm wondering if we could use the darker red, in the non-bolded font? And if so, perhaps the text would be a little bit more legible.
> Just wanted to ask about this, please let me know what you think.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3393) Please review scenario error cell text for legibility/accessibility.
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton updated DROOLS-3393:
--------------------------------
Attachment: Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at 11.59.32 AM.png
> Please review scenario error cell text for legibility/accessibility.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3393
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3393
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Klara Kufova
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at 11.59.32 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at 12.05.50 PM.png, Screenshot from 2018-11-30 17-11-43.png
>
>
> [~kkufova] [~bdellasc]
> I noticed that the error text is a little "fuzzy" looking, the edges aren't very sharp and I was concerned that it might not be legible. I asked Danielle about the specs for it and it's the same size just bolded.
> I did an online accessibility text using the following tool, with our current hex values: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/. It failed for level 3 compliance, but I'm not sure we need to shoot for that or not? I tried the darker PatternFly red color "#8b0000" and it passed at all levels, even at smaller sizes.
> I'm wondering if we could use the darker red, in the non-bolded font? And if so, perhaps the text would be a little bit more legible.
> Just wanted to ask about this, please let me know what you think.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3393) Please review scenario error cell text for legibility/accessibility.
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
Liz Clayton created DROOLS-3393:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Please review scenario error cell text for legibility/accessibility.
Key: DROOLS-3393
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3393
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Task
Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
Reporter: Liz Clayton
Assignee: Klara Kufova
[~kkufova] [~bdellasc]
I noticed that the error text is a little "fuzzy" looking, the edges aren't very sharp and I was concerned that it might not be legible. I asked Danielle about the specs for it and it's the same size just bolded.
I did an online accessibility text using the following tool, with our current hex values: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/. It failed for level 3 compliance, but I'm not sure we need to shoot for that or not? I tried the darker PatternFly red color "#8b0000" and it passed at all levels, even at smaller sizes.
I'm wondering if we could use the darker red, in the non-bolded font? And if so, perhaps the text would be a little bit more legible.
Just wanted to ask about this, please let me know what you think.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SECURITY-868) Multithread issue when validate with cached hased password + nonce credential info from JBossCachedAuthenticationManager
by Stefan Guilhen (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SECURITY-868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Stefan Guilhen closed SECURITY-868.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Done
> Multithread issue when validate with cached hased password + nonce credential info from JBossCachedAuthenticationManager
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SECURITY-868
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SECURITY-868
> Project: PicketBox
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: PicketBox
> Reporter: Jim Ma
> Assignee: Stefan Guilhen
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: PicketBox_4_9_0.Final
>
> Attachments: stacktraces.log
>
>
> When the new security domain is configured with catch-type=default in standalone.xml, the validated credential will be put in the JBossCachedAuthenticationManager with principal and domaininfo value pair. In multithread environment, a new validated credential can overwrite the previous thread cached domain info. This will cause even in the same thread , the cached authentication info could not work. For example if one user login with username , password and nonce in two threads : thread A and thread B ;thread A caches the validated credential(hased password +nonce) in JBossCachedAuthenticationMessager, thread B does the authentication, then caches the validated credential (hashed password + nonce) , even it's the same user and passoword, the credential is different because the nonce is diffrent. So the new credential created in thread B will overwrite the previous value created by thread A . So in thread A, the cached validation info won't work and following validation with cached credential will all fail.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SECURITY-701) Wrong character table in Base64Utils
by Stefan Guilhen (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SECURITY-701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Stefan Guilhen reassigned SECURITY-701:
---------------------------------------
Assignee: (was: Stefan Guilhen)
> Wrong character table in Base64Utils
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: SECURITY-701
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SECURITY-701
> Project: PicketBox
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JBossSX
> Affects Versions: PicketBox_4_0_12.Final
> Reporter: wiktorowski maximilien
> Priority: Major
>
> In picketbox-4.0.7.Final.jar org.jboss.security.Base64Utils has a wrong character table
> private static final char[] base64Table = "0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz./".toCharArray();
> It should be
> private static final char[] base64Table = "0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz+/".toCharArray();
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-1223) jboss-ejb-iiop_1_0.xsd does not match Java implementation
by Stefan Guilhen (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Stefan Guilhen reassigned WFLY-1223:
------------------------------------
Assignee: (was: Stefan Guilhen)
> jboss-ejb-iiop_1_0.xsd does not match Java implementation
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-1223
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1223
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: IIOP
> Reporter: david.boeren
> Priority: Minor
>
> There's a mismatch between the schema file in
> docs/schema/jboss-ejb-iiop_1_0.xsd and the java classes that implement
> the parsing of this schema. As is usual in such cases, it's probably
> the documentation that is wrong.
> In the xsd file the children are described as attributes:
> <xs:complexType name="iorTransportConfigType">
> <xs:annotation>
> <xs:documentation>
> <![CDATA[
> The iorTransportConfigType specifies attributes that can
> be used to configure the transport requirements of
> an IIOP enabled EJB3 bean.
> * integrity: indicates if the server (target) supports
> integrity protected messages. The valid values are
> NONE, SUPPORTED or REQUIRED.
> * confidentiality: indicates if the server (target)
> supports privacy protected messages. The values are
> NONE, SUPPORTED or REQUIRED.
> * detect-misordering: indicates if the server (target)
> supports detection of message sequence errors. The
> values are NONE, SUPPORTED or REQUIRED.
> * detect-replay: indicates if the server (target) supports
> detection of message replay attempts. The values
> are NONE, SUPPORTED or REQUIRED.
> * establish-trust-in-client: indicates if the target is
> capable of authenticating a client. The values are
> NONE, SUPPORTED or REQUIRED.
> * establish-trust-in-target: indicates if the target is
> capable of authenticating to a client. The values
> are NONE or SUPPORTED.
> ]]>
> </xs:documentation>
> </xs:annotation>
> <xs:attribute name="integrity" type="xs:string" use="required"
> default="NONE"/>
> <xs:attribute name="confidentiality" type="xs:string"
> use="required" default="NONE"/>
> <xs:attribute name="detect-misordering" type="xs:string"
> use="optional" default="NONE"/>
> <xs:attribute name="detect-replay" type="xs:string"
> use="optional" default="NONE"/>
> <xs:attribute name="establish-trust-in-client" type="xs:string"
> use="required" default="NONE"/>
> <xs:attribute name="establish-trust-in-target" type="xs:string"
> use="required" default="NONE"/>
> </xs:complexType>
> However, in the class
> (org.jboss.metadata.ejb.parser.jboss.ejb3.IIOPMetaDataParser) it
> requires no attributes and expects to see these same children as elements:
> protected IORTransportConfigMetaData
> processTransportConfig(XMLStreamReader reader, final PropertyReplacer
> propertyReplacer) throws XMLStreamException {
> // the transport-config element doesn't have attributes.
> requireNoAttributes(reader);
> EnumSet<Element> requiredElements = EnumSet.of(Element.INTEGRITY,
> Element.CONFIDENTIALITY,
> Element.ESTABLISH_TRUST_IN_CLIENT, Element.ESTABLISH_TRUST_IN_TARGET);
> IORTransportConfigMetaData transportConfig = new
> IORTransportConfigMetaData();
> // process the transport config elements.
> while (reader.hasNext() && reader.nextTag() != END_ELEMENT) {
> Element element = Element.forName(reader.getLocalName());
> // set the element text in the transport config metadata.
> switch (element) {
> case INTEGRITY: {
> requireNoAttributes(reader);
> transportConfig.setIntegrity(getElementText(reader, propertyReplacer));
> break;
> }
> case CONFIDENTIALITY: {
> requireNoAttributes(reader);
> transportConfig.setConfidentiality(getElementText(reader,
> propertyReplacer));
> break;
> }
> case DETECT_MISORDERING: {
> requireNoAttributes(reader);
> transportConfig.setDetectMisordering(getElementText(reader,
> propertyReplacer));
> break;
> }
> case DETECT_REPLAY: {
> requireNoAttributes(reader);
> transportConfig.setDetectReplay(getElementText(reader, propertyReplacer));
> break;
> }
> case ESTABLISH_TRUST_IN_CLIENT: {
> requireNoAttributes(reader);
> transportConfig.setEstablishTrustInClient(getElementText(reader,
> propertyReplacer));
> break;
> }
> case ESTABLISH_TRUST_IN_TARGET: {
> requireNoAttributes(reader);
> transportConfig.setEstablishTrustInTarget(getElementText(reader,
> propertyReplacer));
> break;
> }
> default: {
> throw unexpectedElement(reader);
> }
> }
> requiredElements.remove(element);
> }
> // throw an exception if a required element wasn't found.
> if (!requiredElements.isEmpty()) {
> throw missingRequiredElement(reader, requiredElements);
> }
> return transportConfig;
> }
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3391) UI should select and highlight grid cells with menus.
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
Liz Clayton created DROOLS-3391:
-----------------------------------
Summary: UI should select and highlight grid cells with menus.
Key: DROOLS-3391
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3391
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Task
Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
Reporter: Liz Clayton
Assignee: Daniele Zonca
Grid cell with actions (contextual menus, pop-overs, etc.) should visually indicate a cell selection state (blue border) - both for usability and to align withAlign with DMN and GDT.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
5 years, 4 months