[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-5004) TlsTestCase#testReloadTrustManager fails on IBM Java 8
by Sonia Zaldana (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-5004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Sonia Zaldana commented on WFCORE-5004:
---------------------------------------
When the X500Principal is extracted from the X509Certificate, it contains the email address in encoded form in the canonical representation, so we need to use getName() instead which will use the RFC 2253 representation.
> TlsTestCase#testReloadTrustManager fails on IBM Java 8
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-5004
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-5004
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Affects Versions: 13.0.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Ondrej Kotek
> Assignee: Sonia Zaldana
> Priority: Major
>
> TlsTestCase#testReloadTrustManager fails on IBM Java 8 at [TlsTestCase.java#L439|https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/blob/master...] reporting the same DN. When I try to compare using canonical names, there is a difference. Using RFC1779 or RFC2253 names is ok.
> {noformat}
> Assert.assertEquals(originalFoundDN.getIssuerX500Principal().getName(X500Principal.CANONICAL), ISSUER_DN.getName(X500Principal.CANONICAL));
> [ERROR] TlsTestCase.testReloadTrustManager:439 expected:<....2.840.113549.1.9.1=[#1613656c7974726f6e4077696c64666c792e6f7267],c=uk,st=elytron,cn=...> but was:<....2.840.113549.1.9.1=[elytron@wildfly.org],c=uk,st=elytron,cn=...>
> {noformat}
> Is it just a test issue, or can there be an impact on functionality? In case it's just a test issue, can we assert equality of names? I.e.
> {noformat}
> Assert.assertEquals(originalFoundDN.getIssuerX500Principal().getName(), ISSUER_DN.getName());
> {noformat}
> The same for [TlsTestCase.java#L465|https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/blob/master...] then.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
4 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-5004) TlsTestCase#testReloadTrustManager fails on IBM Java 8
by Sonia Zaldana (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-5004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Sonia Zaldana updated WFCORE-5004:
----------------------------------
Git Pull Request: https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/pull/4236
> TlsTestCase#testReloadTrustManager fails on IBM Java 8
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-5004
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-5004
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Affects Versions: 13.0.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Ondrej Kotek
> Assignee: Sonia Zaldana
> Priority: Major
>
> TlsTestCase#testReloadTrustManager fails on IBM Java 8 at [TlsTestCase.java#L439|https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/blob/master...] reporting the same DN. When I try to compare using canonical names, there is a difference. Using RFC1779 or RFC2253 names is ok.
> {noformat}
> Assert.assertEquals(originalFoundDN.getIssuerX500Principal().getName(X500Principal.CANONICAL), ISSUER_DN.getName(X500Principal.CANONICAL));
> [ERROR] TlsTestCase.testReloadTrustManager:439 expected:<....2.840.113549.1.9.1=[#1613656c7974726f6e4077696c64666c792e6f7267],c=uk,st=elytron,cn=...> but was:<....2.840.113549.1.9.1=[elytron@wildfly.org],c=uk,st=elytron,cn=...>
> {noformat}
> Is it just a test issue, or can there be an impact on functionality? In case it's just a test issue, can we assert equality of names? I.e.
> {noformat}
> Assert.assertEquals(originalFoundDN.getIssuerX500Principal().getName(), ISSUER_DN.getName());
> {noformat}
> The same for [TlsTestCase.java#L465|https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/blob/master...] then.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
4 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SWSQE-1185) OC API - workload_list - apply Job/Pod filters
by Hayk Hovsepyan (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Hayk Hovsepyan updated SWSQE-1185:
----------------------------------
Description:
openshift_api.workload_list
# TODO apply Job filters
# TODO apply Pod filters
Activate in workload lists test:
# TODO when workloads are filtered put == here
was:
openshift_api.workload_list
# TODO apply Job filters
# TODO apply Pod filters
> OC API - workload_list - apply Job/Pod filters
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SWSQE-1185
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SWSQE-1185
> Project: Kiali QE
> Issue Type: QE Task
> Reporter: Hayk Hovsepyan
> Priority: Major
> Labels: automation
>
> openshift_api.workload_list
> # TODO apply Job filters
> # TODO apply Pod filters
>
> Activate in workload lists test:
> # TODO when workloads are filtered put == here
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
4 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5437) Unable to deploy project to kie server
by Yeser Amer (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Yeser Amer commented on DROOLS-5437:
------------------------------------
Hi [~adupliak], I tried to reproduce it and I have the same behavior reported by [~jomarko].
I think this is not related to Test Scenario, so I strongly recommend to re-address it or to require support by Appformer team.
> Unable to deploy project to kie server
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-5437
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5437
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 7.39.0.Final
> Reporter: Anna Dupliak
> Assignee: Yeser Amer
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: drools-tools
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2020-06-17 07-29-32.png, c.d is undefined 2.scesim, c.d is undefined.scesim, error.log, image-2020-06-16-21-39-06-147.png, undefinedType.webm
>
>
> Cannot deploy any project to kie-server
> Kie server fails deploying project with message [^c.d is undefined.scesim] [^c.d is undefined 2.scesim]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
4 years, 7 months