[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-13594) Upgrade Artemis Native to 1.0.2
by Emmanuel Hugonnet (Jira)
Emmanuel Hugonnet created WFLY-13594:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Upgrade Artemis Native to 1.0.2
Key: WFLY-13594
URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-13594
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Component Upgrade
Components: JMS
Affects Versions: 20.0.0.Final
Reporter: Emmanuel Hugonnet
Assignee: Emmanuel Hugonnet
Because of a fix in the kernel, libaio is now returning duplicate events
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-5012) Upgrade Jboss Threads to 2.3.5
by Yeray Borges Santana (Jira)
Yeray Borges Santana created WFCORE-5012:
--------------------------------------------
Summary: Upgrade Jboss Threads to 2.3.5
Key: WFCORE-5012
URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-5012
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Component Upgrade
Components: Server
Reporter: Yeray Borges Santana
Assignee: Yeray Borges Santana
Upgrade jboss Thread to 2.3.5
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5147) [DMN Designer] DMN Decision Table - Input/Output clauses enhancements (UX)
by Elizabeth Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Elizabeth Clayton updated DROOLS-5147:
--------------------------------------
Sprint: (was: 2020 Week 25-27 (from Jun 15))
> [DMN Designer] DMN Decision Table - Input/Output clauses enhancements (UX)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-5147
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5147
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Guilherme Gomes
> Assignee: Elizabeth Clayton
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: UXTeam, drools-tools, kogito-tooling
> Attachments: prototype.png
>
>
> Currently, the DMN Decision Tables input/output clauses work fine, but they have the following unpractical scenarios:
> - When users have a structure input node "associated" with an input clause (input column), they frequently need to go back to the data types page and remember the name of some field.
> - When users select a structure data type as the type of an output clause, they need to create sub-columns for each field manually.
> The goal for this JIRA is to get input from UX to enhance interactions with input and output clauses.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-5004) TlsTestCase#testReloadTrustManager fails on IBM Java 8
by Sonia Zaldana (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-5004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Sonia Zaldana commented on WFCORE-5004:
---------------------------------------
When the X500Principal is extracted from the X509Certificate, it contains the email address in encoded form in the canonical representation, so we need to use getName() instead which will use the RFC 2253 representation.
> TlsTestCase#testReloadTrustManager fails on IBM Java 8
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-5004
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFCORE-5004
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Affects Versions: 13.0.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Ondrej Kotek
> Assignee: Sonia Zaldana
> Priority: Major
>
> TlsTestCase#testReloadTrustManager fails on IBM Java 8 at [TlsTestCase.java#L439|https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/blob/master...] reporting the same DN. When I try to compare using canonical names, there is a difference. Using RFC1779 or RFC2253 names is ok.
> {noformat}
> Assert.assertEquals(originalFoundDN.getIssuerX500Principal().getName(X500Principal.CANONICAL), ISSUER_DN.getName(X500Principal.CANONICAL));
> [ERROR] TlsTestCase.testReloadTrustManager:439 expected:<....2.840.113549.1.9.1=[#1613656c7974726f6e4077696c64666c792e6f7267],c=uk,st=elytron,cn=...> but was:<....2.840.113549.1.9.1=[elytron@wildfly.org],c=uk,st=elytron,cn=...>
> {noformat}
> Is it just a test issue, or can there be an impact on functionality? In case it's just a test issue, can we assert equality of names? I.e.
> {noformat}
> Assert.assertEquals(originalFoundDN.getIssuerX500Principal().getName(), ISSUER_DN.getName());
> {noformat}
> The same for [TlsTestCase.java#L465|https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/blob/master...] then.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 1 month